Cited by 18Angiogenesis and VEGF in CancerNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Effect of Semax and its C-terminal Fragment Pro-Gly-Pro on the Expression of VEGF Family Genes and their Receptors in Experimental Focal Ischemia of the Rat Brain

Medvedeva, Ekaterina V., Dmitrieva, Veronika G., Povarova, Oksana V., Limborska, Svetlana A., Skvortsova, Veronika I., Myasoedov, Nikolay F., Dergunova, Lyudmila V.·2013·Journal of Molecular Neuroscience

Abstract

The synthetic peptide Semax (Met-Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro) is used successfully in acute stroke therapy. In spite of numerous studies on the subject, many aspects of the neuroprotective effects of the peptide remain unknown. We studied the action of Semax and its C-terminal tripeptide Pro-Gly-Pro on the expression of the VEGF gene family (Vegf-a, Vegf-b, Vegf-c, Vegf-d, and Plgf) and their receptors (Vegfr-1, Vegfr-2, and Vegfr-3) in the frontoparietal cortex region of the rat brain at 3, 24, and 72 h after permanent left middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO). The relative mRNA level of the genes studied was assessed using real-time reverse transcription-PCR. The Vegf-b and Vegf-d genes were most affected by the peptides, which resulted in their most noticeable activation at 3 h after pMCAO. The level of Vegf-d transcripts decreased considerably, whereas the mRNA level of the Vegf-b gene was significantly increased after 72 h of treatment with each of the peptides. In addition, the effects of the peptides on the expression of the Vegf-b and Vegf-d genes were the opposite of the action of ischemia. It is suggested that the identified effects of the peptides diminish the effects of ischemia, thus participating in the positive therapeutic effect of Semax on ischemic stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12031-012-9853-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 18

Authors
Medvedeva, E. V., Dmitrieva, V. G., Povarova, O. V., Limborska, S. A., Skvortsova, V. I., Myasoedov, N. F., & Dergunova, L. V.
Affiliations
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
Corresponding author
Medvedeva, Ekaterina V.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
Published
2012-07-08
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
328-333
ISSN
  • 0895-8696 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1166
OpenAlex
W1981764969
Cited by
18
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
Semax, VEGF receptors, VEGF-B, VEGF-D, VEGF-A, placental growth factor, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR-3, focal cerebral ischemia, middle cerebral artery occlusion, ischemic stroke, neuroprotection, gene expression, mRNA levels, frontoparietal cortex
MeSH terms
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Animals, Frontal Lobe, Male, Oligopeptides, Parietal Lobe, Peptide Fragments, Proline, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Rats, Wistar, Neuroprotective Agents, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review