Chemokine CCL2 induces apoptosis in cortex following traumatic brain injury
Abstract
The chemokine C-C motif ligand 2 (CCL2) is an important mediator of neuroinflammation. Released in response to acute injury, ischemia, and neurodegenerative disease, CCL2 binds primarily to the G-protein-coupled chemokine C-C motif receptor 2 (CCR2) to recruit inflammatory cells to sites of tissue damage. Inflammation is thought to have both beneficial and deleterious consequences following traumatic brain injury (TBI), so we investigated CCL2-CCR2 signaling during the post-TBI period to assess possible neurodegenerative and protective actions. Local TBI in adult rat cortex was induced by Feeney's weight-drop method, and the expression of CCL2 and CCR2 in the tissue around the contusion site was measured by real-time quantitative PCR. Both CCL2 and CCR2 mRNA levels were increased markedly for at least 10 days after injury, peaking on day 3. The CCL2 protein was mainly co-localized with the astroglial marker glial fibrillary acidic protein and CCR2 protein with the neuronal nuclear marker NeuN as revealed by double immunofluorescence staining. A selective CCR2 antagonist, RS504393, reduced TUNEL staining, a marker of apoptosis, and improved performance in the Morris water maze 3 days post-TBI, suggesting that CCL2-CCR2 signaling has deleterious effects on neuronal survival and learning. Targeting the CCL2-CCR2 pathway may provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of TBI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CCX872 and RS504393, two selective CCR2 antagonists, reduce post-injury macrophage recruitment and improve functional recovery after CCI and weight drop TBI.
“Separate groups have shown that CCX872 and RS504393, two selective CCR2 antagonists, reduce post-injury macrophage recruitment and improve functional recovery after CCI and weight drop TBI (76, 77).”
From The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [77]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Liu, S., Zhang, L., Wu, Q., Wu, Q., & Wang, T.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing Medical University (CN)
- Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Tong
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-08-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1021-1029
- ISSN
- 0895-8696 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2067645235
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
- Keywords
- MCP-1, CCR2, traumatic brain injury, apoptosis, neuroinflammation, CCR2 antagonist, cortical neurons, glial fibrillary acidic protein, spatial learning, neuroprotection, chemokine signaling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Injuries, Cerebral Cortex, Male, RNA, Messenger, Spiro Compounds, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Apoptosis, Maze Learning, Chemokine CCL2, Benzoxazines, Rats, Receptors, CCR2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review