Reactive Astrogliosis after Spinal Cord Injury—Beneficial and Detrimental Effects
Abstract
Reactive astrogliosis is a pathologic hallmark of spinal cord injury (SCI). It is characterised by profound morphological, molecular, and functional changes in astrocytes that occur within hours of SCI and evolves as time elapses after injury. Astrogliosis is a defense mechanism to minimize and repair the initial damage but eventually leads to some detrimental effects. Reactive astrocytes secrete a plethora of both growth promoting and inhibitory factors after SCI. However, the production of inhibitory components surpasses the growth stimulating factors, thus, causing inhibitory effects. In severe cases of injury, astrogliosis results in the formation of irreversible glial scarring that acts as regeneration barrier due to the expression of inhibitory components such as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. Scar formation was therefore recognized from a negative perspective for many years. Accumulating evidence from pharmacological and genetic studies now signifies the importance of astrogliosis and its timing for spinal cord repair. These studies have advanced our knowledge regarding signaling pathways and molecular mediators, which trigger and modulate reactive astrocytes and scar formation. In this review, we discuss the recent advances in this field. We also review therapeutic strategies that have been developed to target astrocytes reactivity and glial scaring in the environment of SCI. Astrocytes play pivotal roles in governing SCI mechanisms, and it is therefore crucial to understand how their activities can be targeted efficiently to harness their potential for repair and regeneration after SCI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Following spinal cord injury, astrocytes in the CNS undergo reactive astrogliosis.
“Following SCI, astrocytes in the CNS undergo a series of changes collectively referred to as reactive astrogliosis [194, 195].”
From Extracellular vesicles as nanotheranostic platforms for targeted neurological disorder interventions (2024) · cites this paper as [195]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 184 · Cited by 331
- Authors
- Karimi-Abdolrezaee, S., & Billakanti, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Venue
- Molecular Neurobiology
- Published
- 2012-06-09
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-264
- ISSN
- 0893-7648 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1182
- OpenAlex
- W2039758887
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- reactive astrogliosis, spinal cord injury, astrocytes, glial scar, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, inhibiting factors, growth factors, spinal cord regeneration, signaling pathways, astrocyte-targeted therapy, scar formation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Astrocytes, Cicatrix, Gliosis, Humans, Spinal Cord, Spinal Cord Injuries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review