Cited by 28Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Endogenous Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Fragmentation Is Linked to Amyloid Pathology in Transgenic Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s Disease

Saul, Anika, Wirths, Oliver·2017·Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

The epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE4) gene is the most important risk factor implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) etiology. ApoE4 is more susceptible to proteolysis, and ApoE fragments have been shown to promote tau hyperphosphorylation and exert neurotoxic properties. While a plethora of studies deals with the effect of ApoE and its fragments on amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) deposition and clearance, it is largely unknown whether Aβ in turn influences human or murine ApoE expression and its proteolysis. The present study is the first to show that endogenous murine ApoE becomes proteolytically processed in a way reminiscent of human ApoE fragmentation in different AD mouse models, including APP/PS1KI or 5XFAD. Murine ApoE fragments were demonstrated to accumulate mainly in synaptic fractions in AD mouse models. In vitro experiments, as well as analysis of mouse models at different time points, suggest that the amount of total ApoE is associated with extracellular Aβ while the amount of its fragments is linked to intracellular Aβ levels. Murine ApoE fragmentation is a common feature in different AD transgenic mouse models and could be directly associated with intraneuronal Aβ accumulation. Extracellular amyloid induces an elevation in full-length ApoE expression, which might present a protective mechanism toward Aβ clearance. The demonstrated fragments of murine ApoE in vitro and in vivo might therefore play a crucial role in the progression of AD pathology in murine…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12035-015-9674-4

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saul, A., & Wirths, O.
Affiliations
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Wirths, Oliver
Venue
Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2016-01-07
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
319-327
ISSN
  • 0893-7648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1182
OpenAlex
W2230043761
Cited by
28
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer Forschung Initiative e.V (12802)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, intraneuronal amyloid-beta, 5xFAD mice, transgenic mouse model, APOE ε4
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Peptide Fragments, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Apolipoprotein E4, DNA Fragmentation, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review