Cited by 17Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

XBP1 and PERK Have Distinct Roles in Aβ-Induced Pathology

Cheng, Kuan-Chung, Chiang, Hsueh-Cheng·2018·Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress triggers multiple cellular signals to restore cellular function or induce proapoptosis that is altered in the brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the role of ER stress in β-amyloid (Aβ)-induced AD pathology remains elusive, and data obtained from different animal models and under different experimental conditions are sometimes controversial. The current study conducted in vivo genetic experiments to systematically examine the distinct role of each ER stress effector during disease progression. Our results indicated that inositol-requiring enzyme 1 was activated before protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) activation in Aβ42 transgenic flies. Proteasome activity played a key role in this sequential activation. Furthermore, our study separated learning deficits from early degeneration in Aβ-induced impairment by demonstrating that X-box binding protein 1 overexpression at an early stage reversed Aβ-induced early death without affecting learning performance in the Aβ42 transgenic flies. PERK activation was determined to only enhance Aβ-induced learning deficits. Moreover, proteasome overactivation was determined to delay PERK activation and improve learning deficits. Altogether, the findings of this study demonstrate the complex roles of ER stress during Aβ pathogenesis and the possibility of using different ER stress effectors as reporters to indicate the status of disease progression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12035-018-0942-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 17

Authors
Cheng, K.-C., & Chiang, H.-C.
Affiliations
National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chiang, Hsueh-Cheng
Venue
Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2018-02-09
Volume
55
Issue
9
Pages
7523-7532
ISSN
  • 0893-7648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1182
OpenAlex
W2788075212
Cited by
17
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 104-2320-B-006 -037 -MY3)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
XBP1, PERK, endoplasmic reticulum stress, amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, proteasome, learning deficits, neuronal cell death, disease progression, unfolded protein response
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Learning, Time Factors, Signal Transduction, Amyloid beta-Peptides, eIF-2 Kinase, Drosophila Proteins, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review