Cited by 19Memory and Neural MechanismsAntioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleraceaNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Degradation of Caytaxin Causes Learning and Memory Deficits via Activation of DAPK1 in Aging

Guo, Yu, Li, Hao, Ke, Xiao, Deng, Manfei, Wu, Zhuoze, Cai, You, Afewerky, Henok Kessete, Zhang, Xiaoan +2 more·2019·Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

Loss of memory is an inevitable clinic sign in aging, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here we show that death-associated protein kinase (DAPK1) is involved in the decays of learning and memory in aging via degradation of Caytaxin, a brain-specific member of BNIP-2. DAPK1 becomes activated in the hippocampus of mice during aging. Activation of DAPK1 is closely associated with degradation of Caytaxin protein. Silencing Caytaxin by the expression of small interfering RNA (siRNA) that targets specifically to Caytaxin in the hippocampus of adult mice impairs the learning and memory. Genetic inactivation of DAPK1 by deletion of DAPK1 kinase domain prevents the degradation of Caytaxin and protects against learning and memory declines. Thus, activation of DAPK1 impairs learning and memory by degrading Caytaxin during aging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12035-018-1312-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DAPK1 is a calcium-dependent serine/threonine kinase highly expressed in the cortex in Alzheimer's disease, after ischemic damage, and in physiological ageing where it may play a role in the decay of learning and memory.

    “DAPK1 (FC = 1.08, p = 0.05) is a calcium-dependent serine/threonine kinase that is highly expressed in the cortex in AD [167], after ischemic damage [154], and in physiological ageing where it has been suggested to play a role in the decay of learning and memory with age [51].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 19

Authors
Guo, Y., Li, H., Ke, X., Deng, M., Wu, Z., Cai, Y., Afewerky, H. K., Zhang, X., Pei, L., & Lu, Y.
Affiliations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Pei, Lei
  • Lu, Youming
Venue
Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2018-08-17
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
3368-3379
ISSN
  • 0893-7648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1182
OpenAlex
W2887375527
Cited by
19
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31721002, 91632306, 51627807, 81571078)
  • the Medjaden Academy & Research Foundation for Young Scientists (MARFYS) (MJR20160057)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
DAPK1, DAPK, protein degradation, learning and memory impairment, aging, hippocampus, siRNA knockdown, age-related memory decline
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Enzyme Activation, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Gene Silencing, Caspase 3, Proteolysis, Death-Associated Protein Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review