CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

What do experts talk about when they talk about users? Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid

Throndsen, William·2017·Energy Efficiency
DOI 10.1007/s12053-016-9456-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12053-016-9456-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Abi Ghanem, D., & Mander, S. (2014). Designing consumer engagement with the smart grids of the future: bringing active demand technology to everyday life. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26, 1163–1175. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.974531 . · DOI
  2. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In Bijker, E. W. and J. Law., 1994. Shaping technology, building society (pp. 205-224). London: The MIT Press.
  3. Alexander, B. R. (2010). Dynamic pricing? Not so fast! A residential consumer perspective. The Electricity Journal, 23, 39–49. · DOI
  4. Bartusch, C., Wallin, F., Odlare, M., Vassileva, I., & Wester, L. (2011). Introducing a demand-based electricity distribution tariff in the residential sector: demand response and customer perception. Energy Policy, 39, 5008–5025. · DOI
  5. Borlick, R. (2011). Paying for demand-side response at the wholesale level: the small consumers’ perspective. The Electricity Journal, 24, 8–19. · DOI
  6. Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology analysis & strategic management, 18, 285–298. · DOI
  7. Bouffard, S., & Kirschen, D. S. (2008). Centralised and distributed electricity systems. Energy Policy, 36, 4504–4508. · DOI
  8. Braithwait, S. D. (2003). Demand response is important—however, let’s not oversell (or over-price) it. The Electricity Journal, 16, 52–64. · DOI
  9. Brown, N., & Michael, M. (2003). A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15, 3–18. · DOI
  10. Burgess, J., & Nye, M. (2008). Rematerialising energy use through transparent monitoring systems. Energy Policy, 36, 4454–4459. · DOI
  11. Cavoukian, A., Polonetsky, J., & Wolf, C. (2010). SmartPrivacy for the smart grid: embedding privacy into the design of electricity conservation. Identity in the Information Society., 3, 275–294. · DOI
  12. Chassin, D. P. (2010). What can the smart grid do for you? And what can you do for the smart grid? The Electricity Journal, 23, 57–63. · DOI
  13. Cotton, M., & Devine-Wright, P. (2012). Making electricity networks ‘visible’: industry actor representations of ‘publics’ and public engagement in infrastructure planning. Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), 17–35. · DOI
  14. Darby, S. J. (2012). Metering: EU policy and implications for fuel poor households. Energy Policy, 49, 98–106. · DOI
  15. Faruqui, A. (2010). The ethics of dynamic pricing. The Electricity Journal, 23, 13–27. · DOI
  16. Felder, F. (2012). Chapter 4—The equity implications of smart grid: questioning the size and distribution of smart grid costs and benefits. In Smart Grid (pp. 85–100). Boston: Academic. · DOI
  17. Geels, F. W., & Smit, W. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32, 867–885. · DOI
  18. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2010). Making energy visible. A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy, 38, 6111–6119. · DOI
  19. Ivory, C. (2013). The role of the imagined user in planning and design narratives. Planning Theory, 12, 425–441. · DOI
  20. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. · DOI
  21. Latour, B. (1988). The politics of explanation: an alternative Knowledge and Reflexivity. New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge, 10, 155–176.
  22. Maranta, A., Guggenheim, M., Gisler, P., & Pohl, C. (2003). The reality of experts and the imagined lay person. Acta Sociologica, 46, 105–165. · DOI
  23. McGee, M. C. (1980). The “ideograph”: a link between rhetoric and ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, 1–16. · DOI
  24. Newsham, G. R., & Bowker, B. G. (2010). The effect of utility time-varying pricing and load control strategies on residential summer peak electricity use: a review. Energy Policy, 37, 3289–3296. · DOI
  25. Nichols, D., & Stutz, J. (2001). Load response: new, or déjà vu? The Electricity Journal, 14, 73–79. · DOI
  26. Nyborg, S., & Røpke, I. (2013). Constructing users in the smart grid - insights from the Danish eFlex project. Energy Efficiency, 6, 655–670. doi: 10.1007/s12053-013-9210-1 . · DOI
  27. Papagiannis, G., Dagoumas, A., Lettas, N., & Dokopoulos, P. (2008a). Economic and environmental impacts from the implementation of an intelligent demand side management system at the European level. Energy Policy, 36, 163–180. · DOI
  28. Papagiannis, G., Dagoumas, A., Lettas, N., & Dokopoulos, P. (2008b). Economic and environmental impacts from the implementation of an intelligent demand side management system at the European level. Energy Policy, 36, 163–180. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.005 . · DOI
  29. Prignot, N. & Wallenborn G. (2009). “Standardisation of practices and representations of users in the ecodesign Directive”, Proceedings of ECEEE 2009 summer study, panel 8: dynamics of consumption 1-6 June 2009, pp 1763-1772.
  30. Prüggler, N., Verboven, P., & Hübner, M. (2014). Collection of regional and national key projects as a starting point for the establishment of ERA-Net Smart Grids Plus Smart Grids Demo Snapshots 2013/2014. Smart Grids ERA-Net Deliverable D, 4A(4), 1.
  31. Schick, L., & Gad, C. (2015). Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—a study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 51–59. · DOI
  32. Schick, L., & Winthereik, B. R. (2013). Innovating relations—or why smart grid is not too complex for the public. Science & Technology Studies, 26, 82–102. · DOI
  33. Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Consuming Technologies. Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge. · DOI
  34. Skjølsvold, T. M. (2014). Back to the futures: retrospecting the prospects of smart grid technology. Futures, 63, 26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.001 . · DOI
  35. Skjølsvold, T. M., & Lindkvist, C. (2015). Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid: insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 43–50. · DOI
  36. Skjølsvold, T. M., & Ryghaug, M. (2015). Embedding smart energy technology in built environments: a comparative study of four smart grid demonstration projects. Indoor + Built Environment, 24(7), 878–890. · DOI
  37. Smith, D. E., (1978). ‘K is mentally ill’: the anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12(1), 23–53. · DOI
  38. Stephen, B., Mutanen, A. J., Galloway, S., Burt, G., & Järventausta, P. (2014). Enhanced load profiling for residential network customers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery., 29, 88–96. · DOI
  39. Strengers, Y. (2013). Smart energy technologies in everyday life. Smart Utopia? Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan. · DOI
  40. Throndsen, W., & Ryghaug, M. (2015). Material participation and the smart grid: exploring different modes of articulation. Energy Research & Social Science, Special Issue on Smart Grids and the Social Sciences, 9, 157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.012 . · DOI
  41. Van Lente, H. (2000). Forceful futures: from promise to requirement. In N. Brown, B. Rappert, & A. Webster (Eds.), Contested futures. A sociology of prospective techno-science (pp. 43–64). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  42. Van Lente, H. (2006). Expected behavior. In P.-P. Verbeek, A. Slob (Eds.), User behavior and technology development (pp. 211–219). Springer. · DOI
  43. Walker, G., Cass, N., Burningham, K., & Barnett, J. (2010). Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of ‘the public’ and their implications. Environment and planning A, 42, 931–941. · DOI
  44. Wall, T. (2010). Stockholm Royal Seaport—a smart grid for a sustainable city project. Power Point slides retrieved 1.07.2014 http://www.ieadsm.org/Files/Exco%20File%20Library/Workshop,%20Stockholm%20October%202010/Wall.pdf .
  45. Wallenborn, G., Orsini, M., & Vanhaverbeke, J. (2011). Household appropriation of electricity monitors. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 146–152. · DOI
  46. Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 37–102). London: Routledge.

Metadata

Authors
Throndsen, W.
Venue
Energy Efficiency
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-06-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
283-297
ISSN
  • 1570-646X
  • 1570-6478
DOI
10.1007/s12053-016-9456-5
Cited by
40
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review