Dynamics of Chinese Shidu Parents’ Vulnerability in Old Age –A Qualitative Study
Open accessAbstract
Shidu is a Chinese word, referring to a group of bereaved parents who were subject to the One-Child Policy and whose only child has died. Living in a society where care for older people largely relies on adult children, Shidu parents can be highly vulnerable due to losing an only child who may be their primary resource for old age security. Despite the noticeable rise of Shidu families in China, these vulnerable parents have often been overlooked in society and neglected by government policies. This article adopts a qualitative approach to analyse interviews with 15 older Shidu parents and four support professionals, capturing dynamic experiences of these parents’ vulnerability in grief, elderly care and end-of-life care. Through a sociological lens, these Shidu parents are found to have adapted, revised and even rejected the status quo to cope with significant gaps in support and to negotiate for more meaningful support for their old age. This dynamic but distressing picture has also revealed a lack of ongoing structures that can effectively address these older Shidu parents’ multifaceted and changing needs. Based on the findings, recommendations are made aiming to inform future practice and policymaking for older Shidu parents.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Features of Prolonged Grief Symptoms in Chinese and Swiss Bereaved Parents
Xiu, D., Maercker, A., Woynar, S., Geirhofer, B., Yang, Y., & Jia, X. (2016) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000000539 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy
Cai, Y., & Feng, W. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090220-032839 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fang, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Bath (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fang, Chao
- ORCID
- Fang, Chao
- Venue
- Journal of Population Ageing
- Published
- 2020-08-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-119
- ISSN
- 1874-7876 (ISSN-L)
- 1874-7884
- OpenAlex
- W3048295544
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Population Ageing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Bath
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Keywords
- bereaved parents, one-child policy, elderly care, end-of-life care, grief, intergenerational support, coping strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review