The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precision–recall curve (PRC) classification trees
Open accessAbstract
The classification of imbalanced data has presented a significant challenge for most well-known classification algorithms that were often designed for data with relatively balanced class distributions. Nevertheless skewed class distribution is a common feature in real world problems. It is especially prevalent in certain application domains with great need for machine learning and better predictive analysis such as disease diagnosis, fraud detection, bankruptcy prediction, and suspect identification. In this paper, we propose a novel tree-based algorithm based on the area under the precision–recall curve for variable selection in the classification context. Our algorithm, named as the “Precision–Recall curve classification tree”, or simply the “PRC classification tree” modifies two crucial stages in tree building. The first stage is to maximize the area under the precision–recall curve in node variable selection. The second stage is to maximize the harmonic mean of recall and precision (F-measure) for threshold selection. We found the proposed PRC classification tree, and its subsequent extension, the PRC random forest, work well especially for class-imbalanced data sets. We have demonstrated that our methods outperform their classic counterparts, the usual CART and random forest for both synthetic and real data. Furthermore, the ROC classification tree proposed by our group previously, based on the area under the ROC curve, has shown good performance in imbalanced data. Their combination, the PRC–ROC tree, has also shows great promise in identifying the minority class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Saito, T., & Rehmsmeier, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118432 · Cited by 5,309
Cited by
Enhancing Heart Disease Prediction Accuracy through Machine Learning Techniques and Optimization
Chandrasekhar, N., & Peddakrishna, S. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11041210 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Miao, J., & Zhu, W.
- Venue
- Evolutionary Intelligence
- Published
- 2021-04-14
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1545-1569
- ISSN
- 1864-5909 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-5917
- OpenAlex
- W3153077810
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precision–recall curve (PRC) classification trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12065-021-00565-2
- The paper
- Miao, J., & Zhu, W. (2022). Precision–recall curve (PRC) classification trees. Evolutionary Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00565-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.