EdgeTC - a PBFT blockchain-based ETC scheme for smart cities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hyperledger Fabric-based blockchains are more efficient and able to maintain stable time consumption during smart city transactions compared to Ethereum blockchains.
“Compared to Ethereum blockchains, Hyperledger Fabric-based blockchains are more efficient and able to maintain stable time consumption during smart city transactions (Chiu and Meng 2021).”
From Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review (2022) · cites this paper as Chiu and Meng 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Chiu, W.-Y., & Meng, W.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Meng, Weizhi
- Venue
- Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications
- Published
- 2021-03-25
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2874-2886
- ISSN
- 1936-6442 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6450
- OpenAlex
- W3138493078
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Keywords
- electronic toll collection, blockchain, PBFT consensus, smart cities, decentralized storage, trustworthiness, Hyperledger Fabric, Ethereum, transaction throughput, toll roads
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
