CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57Radioactive element chemistry and processingMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsNuclear and radioactivity studies

Application Progress of Deinococcus radiodurans in Biological Treatment of Radioactive Uranium-Containing Wastewater

Open access
Li, Shanshan, Zhu, Qiqi, Luo, Jiaqi, Shu, Yangzhen, Guo, Kexin, Xie, Jingxi, Xiao, Fangzhu, He, Shuya·2021·Indian Journal of Microbiology
DOI 10.1007/s12088-021-00969-9PMC PMC8542025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Radioactive uranium wastewater contains a large amount of radionuclide uranium and other heavy metal ions. The radioactive uranium wastewater discharged into the environment will not only pollute the natural environment, but also threat human health. Therefore, the treatment of radioactive uranium wastewater is a current research focus for many researchers. The treatment in radioactive uranium wastewater mainly includes physical, chemical and biological methods. At present, the using of biological treatment to treat uranium in radioactive uranium wastewater has been gradually shown its superiority and advantages. Deinococcus radiodurans is a famous microorganism with the most radiation resistant to ionizing radiation in the world, and can also resist various other extreme pressures. D. radiodurans can be directly used for the adsorption of uranium in radioactive waste water, and it can also transform other functional genes into D. radiodurans to construct genetically engineered bacteria, and then applied to the treatment of radioactive uranium containing wastewater. Radionuclides uranium in radioactive uranium-containing wastewater treated by D. radiodurans involves a lot of mechanisms. This article reviews currently the application of D. radiodurans that directly or construct genetically engineered bacteria in the treatment of radioactive uranium wastewater and discusses the mechanism of D. radiodurans in bioremediation of uranium. The application of constructing an engineered bacteria of D. radiodurans with powerful functions in uranium-containing wastewater is prospected.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12088-021-00969-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deinococcus radiodurans reduces the bioavailability and associated risks of hazardous radioactive substances by absorbing them.

    “Deinococcus radiodurans reduces the bioavailability and associated risks of hazardous radioactive substances by absorbing them, thereby cleansing the environment [198,201,202].”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [198]

    The Biosorption section (page not supplied) reports that D. radiodurans adsorbs and removes uranium from radioactive wastewater, supporting the cleansing mechanism. The paper does not establish that adsorption reduces bioavailability and associated risks across hazardous radioactive substances generally; its treatment evidence concerns uranium. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Bottom-up engineering allows for the creation and optimization of microbial consortiums for bioremediation of complex pollutants, but challenges arise due to inaccurate or incomplete data.

    “Bottom-up engineering allows for the creation and optimization of microbial consortiums for bioremediation of complex pollutants, but challenges arise due to inaccurate or incomplete data [198,201,202].”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [198]

    The section on engineered D. radiodurans describes modifying a bacterial strain to treat radioactive waste, and the Summary and Outlook notes that complex uranium wastewater creates treatment challenges. Neither section describes bottom-up design or optimization of microbial consortia, or attributes challenges to inaccurate or incomplete data. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Engineered microbes may persist beyond their intended application sites, leading to unpredictable interactions with native microbial communities and potential ecological imbalances.

    “Engineered microbes may persist beyond their intended application sites, leading to unpredictable interactions with native microbial communities and potential ecological imbalances [198,201,202,252].”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [198]

    The Introduction discusses engineered bacteria surviving radiation during wastewater treatment, and the Summary and Outlook discusses stresses that limit treatment. Neither section addresses persistence beyond application sites, interactions with native microbial communities, or ecological imbalance. Searches for those risks found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. [1]1. Wufuer R, Wei YY, Lin QH, Wang HW, Song WJ, Liu W et al (2017) Uranium bioreduction and biomineralization. Adv Appl Microbiol 101:137-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aambs.2017. 01.003 · DOI
  2. [2]2. Dinocourt C, Legrand M, Dublineau I, Lestaevel P (2015) The neurotoxicology of uranium. Toxicology 337:58-71. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tox.2015.08.004 · DOI
  3. [3]3. Liu B, Peng T, Sun H, Yue H (2017) Release behavior of uranium in uranium mill tailings under environmental conditions. J Environ Radioact 171:160-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad. 2017.02.016 · DOI
  4. [4]4. Kolhe N, Zinjarde S, Acharya C (2018) Responses exhibited by various microbial groups relevant to uranium exposure. Biotechnol Adv 36(7):1828-1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bio techadv.2018.07.002 · DOI
  5. [5]5. Wufuer R, Song W, Zhang D, Pan X, Gadd GM (2018) A survey of uranium levels in urine and hair of people living in a coal <!-- image --> - mining area in Yili, Xinjiang, China. J Environ Radioact 189:168-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.04.009 · DOI
  6. [6]6. Kong L, Zhu Y, Wang M, Li Z, Tan Z, Xu R, Tang H, Chang X, Xiong Y, Chen D (2016) Simultaneous reduction and adsorption for immobilization of uranium from aqueous solution by nanoflake Fe-SC. J Hazard Mater 320:435-441. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.060
  7. [7]7. Carugo O (2018) Structural features of uranium-protein complexes. J Inorg Biochem 189:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jinorgbio.2018.08.014 · DOI
  8. [8]8. Song J, Han B, Song H, Yang J, Zhang L, Ning P, Lin Z (2019) Nonreductive biomineralization of uranium by Bacillus subtilis ATCC-6633 under aerobic conditions. J Environ Radioact 208-209:106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106027 · DOI
  9. [9]9. Tapia-Rodriguez A, Tordable-Martinez V, Sun W, Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R (2011) Uranium bioremediation in continuously fed upflow sand columns inoculated with anaerobic granules. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(11):2583-2591. https://doi.org/10.1002/ bit.23225
  10. [10]10. Maleke M, Williams P, Castillo J, Botes E, Ojo A, DeFlaun M et al (2015) Optimization of a bioremediation system of soluble uranium based on the biostimulation of an indigenous bacterial community. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(11):8442-8450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3980-7 · DOI
  11. [11]11. Sharma T, Sharma A, Kaur I, Mahajan RK, Litoria PK, Sahoo SK et al (2019) Uranium distribution in groundwater and assessment of age dependent radiation dose in Amritsar, Gurdaspur and Pathankot districts of Punjab, India. Chemosphere 219:607-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.039 · DOI
  12. [12]12. Riedel T, Ku ¨beck C (2018) Uranium in groundwater-a synopsis based on a large hydrogeochemical data set. Water Res 129:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.001 · DOI
  13. [13]13. Er } oss A, Csondor K, Izsa ´k B, Vargha M, Horva ´th A ´ , Pa ´ndics T (2018) Uranium in groundwater-the importance of hydraulic regime and groundwater flow system's understanding. J Environ Radioact 195:90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.10. 002 · DOI
  14. [14]14. Kaur S, Mehra R (2019) Toxicological risk assessment of protracted ingestion of uranium in groundwater. Environ Geochem Health 41(2):681-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-01624 · DOI
  15. [15]15. Liesch T, Hinrichsen S, Goldscheider N (2015) Uranium in groundwater-Fertilizers versus geogenic sources. Sci Total Environ 536:981-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015. 05.133 · DOI
  16. [16]16. Ebaid YY, Nasr MM, Santos JKB, Makhlouf O (2020) Behavior of uranium series in groundwater of the Wajid Formation, Wadi AdDawasir, Saudi Arabia. Environ Monitor Assess 192(9):564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08518-5 · DOI
  17. [17]17. Istok JD, Senko JM, Krumholz LR, Watson D, Bogle MA, Peacock A et al (2004) In situ bioreduction of technetium and uranium in a nitrate-contaminated aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 38(2):468-75. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034639p · DOI
  18. [18]18. Lopez AM, Wells A, Fendorf S (2021) Soil and Aquifer properties combine as predictors of groundwater uranium concentrations within the Central Valley, California. Environ Sci Technol 55(1):352-361. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05591 · DOI
  19. [19]19. Kong L, Ruan Y, Zheng Q, Su M, Diao Z, Chen D et al (2020) Uranium extraction using hydroxyapatite recovered from phosphorus containing wastewater. J Hazard Mater 382:120784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120784 · DOI
  20. [20]20. Kelly SD, Kemner KM, Carley J, Criddle C, Jardine PM, Marsh TL et al (2008) Speciation of uranium in sediments before and after in situ biostimulation. Environ Sci Technol 42(5):1558-1564. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071764i · DOI
  21. [21]21. Wu W, Chen D, Li J, Su M, Chen N (2018) Enhanced adsorption of uranium by modified red muds: adsorption behavior study. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(18):18096-18108. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-018-2027-x · DOI
  22. [22]22. Baiget M, Constantı ´ M, Lo ´pez MT, Medina F (2013) Uranium removal from a contaminated effluent using a combined microbial and nanoparticle system. New Biotechnol 30(6):788-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.05.003 · DOI
  23. [23]23. Wang XL, Li Y, Huang J, Zhou YZ, Li BL, Liu DB (2019) Efficiency and mechanism of adsorption of low concentration uranium in water by extracellular polymeric substances. J Environ Radioact 197:81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018. 12.002 · DOI
  24. [24]24. Wang T, Zheng X, Wang X, Lu X, Shen Y (2017) Different biosorption mechanisms of Uranium(VI) by live and heat-killed Saccharomyces cerevisiae under environmentally relevant conditions. J Environ Radioact 167:92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvrad.2016.11.018 · DOI
  25. [25]25. Choudhary S, Sar P (2011) Uranium biomineralization by a metal resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain isolated from contaminated mine waste. J Hazard Mater 186(1):336-343. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.004 · DOI
  26. [26]26. Jeong BC, Hawes C, Bonthrone KM, Macaskie LE (1997) Localization of enzymically enhanced heavy metal accumulation by Citrobacter sp. and metal accumulation in vitro by liposomes containing entrapped enzyme. Microbiology (Reading, England) 143(7):2497-507. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-143-7-249 · DOI
  27. [27]27. Thornley MJ (2010) Radiation resistance among bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol 26(3):334-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672. 1963.tb04784.x · DOI
  28. [28]28. Daly MJ (2000) Engineering radiation-resistant bacteria for environmental biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11(3):280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-1669(00)00096-3 · DOI
  29. [29]29. Appukuttan D, Rao AS, Apte SK (2006) Engineering of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 for bioprecipitation of uranium from dilute nuclear waste. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(12):7873-7878. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01362-06 · DOI
  30. [30]30. Brim H, McFarlan SC, Fredrickson JK, Minton KW, Zhai M, Wackett LP et al (2000) Engineering Deinococcus radiodurans for metal remediation in radioactive mixed waste environments. Nat Biotechnol 18(1):85-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/71986 · DOI
  31. [31]31. Chen TT, Hua W, Zhang XZ, Wang BH, Yang ZS (2017) The effects of pprI gene of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 on acute radiation injury of mice exposed to 60Co c -ray radiation. Oncotarget 8(2):2008-2019. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget. 13893 · DOI
  32. [33]33. Farci D, Bowler MW, Kirkpatrick J, McSweeney S, Tramontano E (1838) Piano D (2014) New features of the cell wall of the radio-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Biochimica et biophysica acta 7:1978-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem. 2014.02.014 · DOI
  33. [34]34. Thompson BG, Murray RG (1981) Isolation and characterization of the plasma membrane and the outer membrane of Deinococcus radiodurans strain Sark. Can J Microbiol 27(7):729-734. https:// doi.org/10.1139/m81-111 · DOI
  34. [35]35. Wang W, Ma Y, He J, Qi H, Xiao F, He S (2019) Gene regulation for the extreme resistance to ionizing radiation of Deinococcus radiodurans. Gene 715:144008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene. 2019.144008 · DOI
  35. [36]36. Hua Y, Narumi I, Gao G, Tian B, Satoh K, Kitayama S, Shen B (2003) PprI: a general switch responsible for extreme radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans. Biochem Biophys Res <!-- image --> Commun 306(2):354-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006291x(03)00965-3 · DOI
  36. [37]37. Agapov AA, Kulbachinskiy AV (2015) Mechanisms of stress resistance and gene regulation in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Biochemistry Biokhimiia 80(10):1201-1216. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297915100016 · DOI
  37. [38]38. Bauermeister A, Bentchikou E, Moeller R, Rettberg P (2009) Roles of PprA, IrrE, and RecA in the resistance of Deinococcus radiodurans to germicidal and environmentally relevant UV radiation. Arch Microbiol 191(12):913-918. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00203-009-0522-7
  38. [39]39. Warfel JD, LiCata VJ (2015) Enhanced DNA binding affinity of RecA protein from Deinococcus radiodurans. DNA Repair 31:91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.05.002 · DOI
  39. [40]40. Ding L, Tan WF, Xie SB, Mumford K, Lv JW, Wang HQ et al (2018) Uranium adsorption and subsequent re-oxidation under aerobic conditions by Leifsonia sp.-coated biochar as green trapping agent. Environ Pollut 242:778-87. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.envpol.2018.07.050
  40. [41]41. Yang J, Dong FQ, Dai QW, Liu MX, Nie XQ, Zhang D, Ma JL, Zhou X (2015) Biosorption of Radionuclide Uranium by Deinococcus radiodurans. Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu 35(4):1010-4
  41. [42]42. Mumtaz S, Streten C, Parry DL, McGuinness KA, Lu P, Gibb KS (2018) Soil uranium concentration at Ranger Uranium Mine Land Application Areas drives changes in the bacterial community. J Environ Radioact 189:14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad. 2018.03.003 · DOI
  42. [43]43. Devigne A, Mersaoui S, Bouthier-de-la-Tour C, Sommer S, Servant P (2013) The PprA protein is required for accurate cell division of c -irradiated Deinococcus radiodurans bacteria. DNA Repair 12(4):265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.01. 004 · DOI
  43. [44]44. Brim H, Osborne JP, Kostandarithes HM, Fredrickson JK, Wackett LP, Daly MJ (2006) Deinococcus radiodurans engineered for complete toluene degradation facilitates Cr(VI) reduction. Microbiology (Reading, England) 152(Pt 8):2469-2477. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.29009-0 · DOI
  44. [45]45. Shen J, Scha ¨fer A (2014) Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: a review. Chemosphere 117:679-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.090 · DOI
  45. [46]46. Misra CS, Mukhopadhyaya R, Apte SK (2014) Harnessing a radiation inducible promoter of Deinococcus radiodurans for enhanced precipitation of uranium. J Biotechnol 189:88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.09.013 · DOI
  46. [47]47. Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO (2017) A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial Biosorbents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph14010094
  47. [48]48. Ji YQ, Hu YT, Tian Q, Shao XZ, Li JY, Safarikova M et al (2010) Biosorption of strontium ions by magnetically modified yeast cells. Sep Sci Technol 45(10):1499-1504. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01496391003705664 · DOI
  48. [49]49. Giese EC (2020) Biosorption as green technology for the recovery and separation of rare earth elements. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 36(4):52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-028216 · DOI
  49. [50]50. Bouzikri S, Ouasfi N, Benzidia N, Salhi A, Bakkas S, Khamliche L (2020) Marine alga ' 'Bifurcaria bifurcata'': biosorption of Reactive Blue 19 and methylene blue from aqueous solutions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(27):33636-33648. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-020-07846-w · DOI
  50. [51]51. Zhao W, Ren B, Hursthouse A, Jiang F (2020) The adsorption of Mn(II) by insolubilized humic acid. Water Sci Technol 82(4):747-758. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.384 · DOI
  51. [52]52. Jin Z, Deng S, Wen Y, Jin Y, Pan L, Zhang Y et al (2019) Application of Simplicillium chinense for Cd and Pb biosorption and enhancing heavy metal phytoremediation of soils. Sci Total Environ 697:134148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019. 134148 · DOI
  52. [53]53. Peng H, Li D, Ye J, Xu H, Xie W, Zhang Y et al (2019) Biosorption behavior of the Ochrobactrum MT180101 on ionic copper and chelate copper. J Environ Manag 235:224-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.060 · DOI
  53. [54]54. Liu MX, Dong FQ, Zhang W, Kang W, Nie XQ, Wei HF et al (2012) Biosorption of uranium by Deinococcus radiodurans cells under culture. Conditions 535-537:2446-2449. https://doi.org/10. 4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.535-537.2446
  54. [55]55. Wasito H, Fatoni A, Hermawan D, Susilowati SS (2019) Immobilized bacterial biosensor for rapid and effective monitoring of acute toxicity in water. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 170:205-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.141 · DOI
  55. [56]56. Kolhe N, Zinjarde S, Acharya C (2020) Removal of uranium by immobilized biomass of a tropical marine yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Environ Radioact 223-224:106419. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106419 · DOI
  56. [57]57. Chen C, Hu J, Wang J (2020) Biosorption of uranium by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Environ Radioact 213:106158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106158 · DOI
  57. [58]58. Qin Y, Dong F, Nie X, Zhang W, Xie JJ, Jo FM (2016) Study on adsorption of uranium by immobilized Deinococcus radioduransand volume reduction. J Funct Mater. https://doi.org/10.3969/ j.issn.1001-9731.2016.06.022
  58. [59]59. Hall CW, Mah TF (2017) Molecular mechanisms of biofilmbased antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41(3):276-301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ femsre/fux010
  59. [60]60. Cologgi DL, Speers AM, Bullard BA, Kelly SD, Reguera G (2014) Enhanced uranium immobilization and reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(21):6638-6646. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02289-14 · DOI
  60. [61]61. Manobala T, Shukla SK, Rao TS, Kumar MD (2019) A new uranium bioremediation approach using radio-tolerant Deinococcus radiodurans biofilm. J Biosci 44(5):122 ( PMID: 31719231 )
  61. [62]62. Hu N, Ding DX, Li SM, Tan X, Li GY, Wang YD et al (2016) Bioreduction of U(VI) and stability of immobilized uranium under suboxic conditions. J Environ Radioact 154:60-67. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.01.020 · DOI
  62. [63]63. Zhang C, Dodge CJ, Malhotra SV, Francis AJ (2013) Bioreduction and precipitation of uranium in ionic liquid aqueous solution by Clostridium sp. Biores Technol 136:752-756. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.085 · DOI
  63. [64]64. Orellana R, Leavitt JJ, Comolli LR, Csencsits R, Janot N, Flanagan KA et al (2013) U(VI) reduction by diverse outer surface c-type cytochromes of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(20):6369-6374. https://doi.org/10.1128/ AEM.02551-1
  64. [65]65. Lakaniemi AM, Douglas GB, Kaksonen AH (2019) Engineering and kinetic aspects of bacterial uranium reduction for the remediation of uranium contaminated environments. J Hazard Mater 371:198-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.074 · DOI
  65. [66]66. Fredrickson JK, Kostandarithes HM, Li SW, Plymale AE, Daly MJ (2000) Reduction of Fe(III), Cr(VI), U(VI), and Tc(VII) by Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(5):2006-2011. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.5.2006-2011. 2000 · DOI
  66. [67]67. Luo J, Weber FA, Cirpka OA, Wu WM, Nyman JL, Carley J et al (2007) Modeling in-situ uranium(VI) bioreduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria. J Contam Hydrol 92(1-2):129-148. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.01.004 <!-- image --> · DOI
  67. [68]68. Pen ˜a J, Straub M, Flury V, Loup E, Corcho J, Steinmann P et al (2020) Origin and stability of uranium accumulation-layers in an Alpine histosol. Sci Total Environ 20(727):138368. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138368 · DOI
  68. [69]69. Newsome L, Morris K, Trivedi D, Bewsher A, Lloyd JR (2015) Biostimulation by glycerol phosphate to precipitate recalcitrant uranium(IV) phosphate. Environ Sci Technol 49(18):11070-11078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02042 · DOI
  69. [70]70. Coelho E, Reis TA, Cotrim M, Rizzutto M, Corre ˆa B (2020) Bioremediation of water contaminated with uranium using Penicillium piscarium. Biotechnol Prog 36(5):e30322. https://doi. org/10.1002/btpr.3032 · DOI
  70. [71]71. Chandwadkar P, Misra HS, Acharya C (2018) Uranium biomineralization induced by a metal tolerant Serratia strain under acid, alkaline and irradiated conditions. Metallomics Integrated Biometal Sci 10(8):1078-1088. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8mt00061a · DOI
  71. [72]72. Kulkarni S, Misra CS, Gupta A, Ballal A, Apte SK (2016) Interaction of uranium with bacterial cell surfaces: inferences from phosphatase-mediated uranium precipitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(16):4965-4974. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM. 00728-16 · DOI
  72. [7]7. Deinococcus radiodurans. J Hazard Mater 262:853-861. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.057 · DOI
  73. [74]74. Xu R, Wu K, Han H, Ling Z, Chen Z, Liu P et al (2018) Coexpression of YieF and PhoN in Deinococcus radiodurans R1 improves uranium bioprecipitation by reducing chromium interference. Chemosphere 211:1156-1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chemosphere.2018.08.061 · DOI
  74. [75]75. Appukuttan D, Seetharam C, Padma N, Rao AS, Apte SK (2011) PhoN-expressing, lyophilized, recombinant Deinococcus radiodurans cells for uranium bioprecipitation. J Biotechnol 154(4):285-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.05.002 · DOI
  75. [76]76. Peng GW, Ding DX (2011) Biosorption behavior of U(VI) in wastewater containing U(VI) by Immobilized Saccharomyces. Cerevisiae 335:1489-92. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific. net/AMR.335-336.1489 · DOI
  76. [77]77. Sorokin ND, Afanasova EN (2011) Microbial indication of soils contaminated with industrial emissions. Contemp Probl Ecol 4(5):508-512. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425511050092 <!-- image --> Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, S., Zhu, Q., Luo, J., Shu, Y., Guo, K., Xie, J., Xiao, F., & He, S.
Affiliations
University of South China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xiao, Fangzhu
  • He, Shuya
ORCID
Venue
Indian Journal of Microbiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-08-12
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
417-426
ISSN
  • 0046-8991 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-7715
DOI
10.1007/s12088-021-00969-9
PMC
PMC8542025
OpenAlex
W3194822543
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11705085)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ6050, 2020JJ4077)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Keywords
Deinococcus radiodurans, radioactive wastewater, bioremediation, uranium adsorption, engineered bacteria, radioresistance (biology), heavy metal contamination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review