Cited by 4Heavy Metal Pollution RemediationChromium effects and bioremediationAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Co-existence of Metal Transporter Genes and Heavy Metal Bioremediation Potential of Bacterial Strains from the Effluent Water

Open access
Kaur, Harpreet, Katyal, Priya, Natt, Simranpreet Kaur, Vikal, Yogesh, Chandel, Sumita·2025·Indian Journal of Microbiology

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination and accumulation pose a major threat to all life forms in the environment due to its toxic nature, non-biodegradable properties and accumulative behavior. The present study aims to investigate the metals resistance mechanisms, removal capacity and bioremediation potential of the high metal-resistant indigenous bacterial species Bacillus thuringiensis strain BHR1, Bacillus cereus strain BHR2, Enterobacter cloacae strain BHR4, Bacillus pumilus strain BHR5, Bacillus altitudinis strain BHR6 and Klebsiella pneumonia strain BHR8 isolated from the effluent water. Moreover, the presence of specific metal transporter genes such as chrA, chrB, pbrA and nccA in these isolates indicated their role in metal resistance and removal. Based on minimum inhibitory concentration, bacterial isolates namely, BHR1 and BHR5 exhibited high metal tolerance against Cr (510 and 550 ppm), Pb (250 and 300 ppm), Ni (300 and 150 ppm) and As (200 and 120 ppm), respectively. The bioremediation potential of these bacterial isolates (BHR1 and BHR5) was evaluated under batch-scale conditions. Our results revealed that the addition of nutrients, as well as modification of pH to 6.0, enhances the bioremediation potential of BHR1 enabling the reduction of Pb, Cr, Ni and Zn by 60.9%, 31%, 22.7% and 22%, respectively. These findings suggested the potential application of these metal resistant bacterial isolates for the bioremediation of heavy metal contaminated effluents. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12088-024-01362-y.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12088-024-01362-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. [2]2. Chen HG, Chen YJ, Chen C, Tu ZZ, Lu Q, Wu P, Chen JX, Wang YX, Pan A (2019) Reproducibility of essential elements chromium, manganese, iron, zinc and selenium in spot samples, firstmorning voids and 24-h collections from healthy adult men. Br J Nutr 122:343-351. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ s0007 11451 90011 93
  2. [3]3. Stovern M, Guzmán H, Rine KP, Felix O, King M, Ela WP, Sáez BEA, A E, (2016) Windblown dust deposition forecasting and spread of contamination around mine tailings. Atmosphere 7:16. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ atmos 70200 16
  3. [4]4. Yang L, Mukherjee S, Pandithurai G, Waghmare V, Safai PD (2019) Influence of dust and sea-salt sandwich effect on precipitation chemistry over the Western Ghats during summer monsoon. Sci Rep 9:1-3. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 019- 55245-0
  4. [5]5. Srivastava V, Sarkar A, Singh S, Singh P, De Araujo AS, Singh RP (2017) Agroecological responses of heavy metal pollution with special emphasis on soil health and plant performances. Front Environ Sci 5:64. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fenvs. 2017. 00064
  5. [6]6. Elumalai V, Brindha K, Lakshmanan E (2017) Human exposure risk assessment due to heavy metals in groundwater by pollution index and multivariate statistical methods: a case study from South Africa. Water 9:234. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ w9040 234
  6. [7]7. Singh DD, Thind PS, Sharma M, Sahoo S, John S (2019) Environmentally sensitive elements in groundwater of an industrial town in India: Spatial distribution and human health risk. Water 11:2350. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ w1111 2350
  7. [8]8. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. Int Sch Res Not 2011:402647. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5402/ 2011/ 402647
  8. [9]9. Hashim MA, Mukhopadhyay S, Sengupta SJN, B, (2011) Remediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated groundwater. J Environ Manag 92:2355-2388. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jenvm an. 2011. 06. 009
  9. [10]10. Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO (2017) A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:94. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ijerp h1401 0094
  10. [11]11. Pal A, Bhattacharjee S, Saha J, Sarkar M, Mandal P (2022) Bacterial survival strategies and responses under heavy metal stress: a comprehensive overview. Crit Rev Microbiol 48:327-355. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 10408 41x. 2021. 19705 12 <!-- image -->
  11. [12]12. Hao X, Zhu J, Rensing C, Liu Y, Gao S, Chen W, Huang Q, Liu YR (2021) Recent advances in exploring the heavy metal (loid) resistant microbiome. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 19:94-109. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. csbj. 2020. 12. 006
  12. [13]13. Gupta K, Chatterjee C, Gupta B (2012) Isolation and characterization of heavy metal tolerant Gram-positive bacteria with bioremedial properties from municipal waste rich soil of Kestopur canal [Kolkata], West Bengal, India. Biologia 67:827-836. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2478/ s11756- 012- 0099-5
  13. [14]14. Shylla L, Barik SK, Joshi SR (2021) Characterization and bioremediation potential of native heavy-metal tolerant bacteria isolated from rat-hole coal mine environment. Arch Microbiol 203:2379-2392. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00203- 021- 02218-5
  14. [15]15. Diba H, Cohan RA, Salimian M, Mirjani R, Soleimani M, Khodabakhsh F (2021) Isolation and characterization of halophilic bacteria with the ability of heavy metal bioremediation and nanoparticle synthesis from Khara salt lake in Iran. Arch Microbiol 203:3893-3903. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00203- 021- 02380-w
  15. [18]18. Bergey DH (1994) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Philadelphia
  16. [19]19. Lankisch PG, Vogt W (1972) Direct hemolytic activity of phospholipase A. Biochem Biophys Acta Lipids Lipid Metab 270:241247. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0005- 2760(72) 90235-4
  17. [20]20. Cubero OF, Crespo ANA, Fatehi J, Bridge PD (1999) DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbariumstored, lichenized, and other fungi. Plant Syst Evol 216:243-249. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF010 84401
  18. [21]21. Kumar V, Sharma A, Chawla A, Bhardwaj R, Thukral AK (2016) Water quality assessment of river Beas, India, using multivariate and remote sensing techniques. Environ Monit Assess 188:1-10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10661- 016- 5141-6
  19. [22]22. Andrews JM (2001) Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 48:5-16. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ jac/ 48. suppl\_1.5
  20. [26]26. Wu YF, Liu CQ, Tu CL (2008) Atmospheric deposition of metals in TSP of Guiyang, PR China. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 80:465-468. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00128- 008- 9397-6
  21. [27]27. Lenart A, Wolny-Koładka K (2013) The effect of heavy metal concentration and soil pH on the abundance of selected microbial groups within Arcelor Mittal Poland steelworks in Cracow. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90:85-90. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00128- 012- 0869-3
  22. [28]28. Murthy S, Bali G, Sarangi SK (2012) Lead biosorption by a bacterium isolated from industrial effluents. Int J Microbiol Res 4:192. https:// doi. org/ 10. 9735/ 0975- 5276.4. 3. 196- 200
  23. [29]29. Forsberg KJ, Reyes A, Wang B, Selleck EM, Sommer MO, Dantas G (2012) The shared antibiotic resistome of soil bacteria and human pathogens. Science 337:1107-1111. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 12207 61
  24. [20]20. isolated from the polluted Maruit Lake, Egypt. J Appl Microbiol 108:1459-1470. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1365- 2672. 2009. 04574.x
  25. [31]31. Yamina B, Tahar B, Marie Laure F (2012) Isolation and screening of heavy metal resistant bacteria from wastewater: a study of heavy metal co-resistance and antibiotics resistance. Water Sci Technol 66:2041-2048. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2166/ wst. 2012. 355
  26. [32]32. Rani MJ, Hemambika B, Hemapriya J, Kannan VR (2010) Comparative assessment of heavy metal removal by immobilized and dead bacterial cells: a biosorption approach. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 4:23-30. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4314/ AJEST. V4I2. 56325
  27. [33]33. Nguyen CC, Hugie CN, Kile ML, Navab-Daneshmand T (2019) Association between heavy metals and antibiotic-resistant human pathogens in environmental reservoirs: a review. Front Environ Sci Eng 13:1-7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11783- 019- 1129-0
  28. [34]34. Seiler C, Berendonk TU (2012) Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture. Front Microbiol 3:399. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fmicb. 2012. 00399
  29. [35]35. Nies DH, Silver S (1995) Ion efflux systems involved in bacterial metal resistances. J Ind Microbiol 14:186-199. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ bf015 69902
  30. [36]36. Rensing C, Pribyl T, Nies DH (1997) New functions for the three subunits of the CzcCBA cation-proton antiporter. J Bacteriol 179:6871-6879. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1128/ jb. 179. 22. 6871- 6879. 1997
  31. [37]37. Manara A, DalCorso G, Baliardini C, Farinati S (2012) Pseudomonas putida response to cadmium: changes in membrane and cytosolic proteomes. J Proteome Res 11:4169-4179. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ pr300 281f
  32. [38]38. Hynninen A, Touzé T, Pitkänen L, Mengin-Lecreulx D, Virta M (2009) An efflux transporter PbrA and a phosphatase PbrB cooperate in a lead-resistance mechanism in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 74:384-394. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1365- 2958. 2009. 06868.x
  33. [39]39. Karelová E, Harichová J, Stojnev T, Ferianc P (2010) The isolation of heavy-metal resistant culturable bacteria and resistance determinants from a heavy-metal-contaminated site. Biologia 66:18-26. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2478/ s11756- 010- 0145-0
  34. [40]40. Gu R, Gao J, Dong L, Liu Y, Li X, Bai Q, Jia Y, Xiao H (2020) Chromium metabolism characteristics of coexpression of ChrA and ChrT gene. Ecotoxicol Environ safety 204:111060. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ecoenv. 2020. 111060
  35. [41]41. Ducret V, Gonzalez MR, Leoni S, Valentini M, Perron K (2020) The CzcCBA efflux system requires the CadA P-type ATPase for timely expression upon zinc excess in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Front Microbiol 11:911. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fmicb. 2020. 00911
  36. [42]42. Borremans B, Hobman JL, Provoost A, Brown NL, van Der Lelie D (2001) Cloning and functional analysis of the pbr lead resistance determinant of Ralstonia metallidurans CH34. J Bacteriol 183:5651-5658. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1128/ jb. 183. 19. 5651- 5658. 2001
  37. [43]43. Fierros-Romero G, Wrosek-Cabrera JA, Gómez-Ramírez M, Pless RC, Rivas-Castillo AM, Rojas-Avelizapa NG (2017) Expression changes in metal-resistance genes in Microbacterium liquefaciens under nickel and vanadium exposure. Curr Microbiol 74:840-847. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00284- 017- 1252-8
  38. [44]44. Ndeddy Aka RJ, Babalola OO (2017) Identification and characterization of Cr-, Cd-, and Ni-tolerant bacteria isolated from mine tailings. Bioremediat J 21:1-9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 10889 868. 2017. 12829 33
  39. [46]46. Saleh LIF, Rashed RO, Muhammed SM (2021) Evaluation of heavy metal content in water and removal of metals using native <!-- image --> isolated bacterial strains. Biodiversitas 22:3163-3174. https:// doi. org/ 10. 13057/ biodiv/ d2208 10
  40. [47]47. Choudhary M, Kumar R, Datta A, Nehra V, Garg N (2017) Bioremediation of heavy metals by microbes. In: Arora S, Singh AK, Singh YP (eds) Bioremediation of salt affected soils: an Indian perspective. Springer, Cham, pp 233-255. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ 978-3- 319- 48257-6\_ 12
  41. [49]49. Oziegbe O, Oluduro AO, Oziegbe EJ, Ahuekwe EF, Olorunsola SJ (2021) Assessment of heavy metal bioremediation potential of bacterial isolates from landfill soils. Saudi J Biol Sci 28:39483956. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. sjbs. 2021. 03. 072 Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. <!-- image -->

Authors
Kaur, H., Katyal, P., Natt, S. K., Vikal, Y., & Chandel, S.
Affiliations
Punjab Agricultural University (IN)
Corresponding author
Kaur, Harpreet
Venue
Indian Journal of Microbiology
Published
2024-08-02
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
1586-1601
ISSN
  • 0046-8991 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-7715
OpenAlex
W4401243472
Cited by
4
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
punjab pollution control board (4809)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
heavy metal bioremediation, metal resistance mechanisms, effluent, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus pumilus, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, chromate resistance, lead removal, nickel removal, arsenic removal, zinc removal, minimum inhibitory concentration, industrial wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review