Cited by 124Family and Disability Support ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

Social, psychological and financial burden on caregivers of children with chronic illness: A cross-sectional study

Khanna, Ankush K., Prabhakaran, Anusha, Patel, Priyanka, Ganjiwale, Jaishree D., Nimbalkar, Somashekhar M.·2015·The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To explore social, psychological and financial burden on caregivers of chronically diseased children. Methods Participants were recruited from ambulatory and hospital areas in pediatrics department following informed consent. Parents who were caregivers of children 18 y or below in age with chronic illness were included. Socio-demographic details were collected using a semi structured questionnaire, adapted from Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS). The psychological well-being of caregivers was assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). Descriptive analysis and ANOVA was done for comparing mean scores of responses to analyze financial, psychological and social burden across different diagnosis. Results A total of 204 (89 females:115 males) participated. Only 27% were receiving some benefits from government or hospital side. No depressive symptoms were reported by 25% caregivers, while 37% reported mild and 38% moderate to severe depressive symptoms. No anxiety symptoms were reported by 33%, while 50% reported mild and 17% moderate to severe anxiety symptoms. No association was seen between gender of the caregiver and depressive or anxiety symptoms. Significantly higher financial and social burden was seen in cerebral palsy and cancer groups vis-a-vis other diseases, being least in thalassemia. Disruption of routine life was highest in cancer group caregivers followed by those in cerebral palsy group. Conclusion…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12098-015-1762-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 124

Authors
Khanna, A. K., Prabhakaran, A., Patel, P., Ganjiwale, J. D., & Nimbalkar, S. M.
Affiliations
Pramukhswami Medical College (IN)
Corresponding author
Nimbalkar, Somashekhar M.
Venue
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2015-05-15
Volume
82
Issue
11
Pages
1006-1011
ISSN
  • 0019-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-7693
OpenAlex
W306649893
Cited by
124
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Indian Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
caregiver burden, children with chronic illness, financial burden, social burden, psychological burden, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, cerebral palsy, childhood cancer, thalassemia, caregiver mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review