Social, psychological and financial burden on caregivers of children with chronic illness: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objectives To explore social, psychological and financial burden on caregivers of chronically diseased children. Methods Participants were recruited from ambulatory and hospital areas in pediatrics department following informed consent. Parents who were caregivers of children 18 y or below in age with chronic illness were included. Socio-demographic details were collected using a semi structured questionnaire, adapted from Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS). The psychological well-being of caregivers was assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). Descriptive analysis and ANOVA was done for comparing mean scores of responses to analyze financial, psychological and social burden across different diagnosis. Results A total of 204 (89 females:115 males) participated. Only 27% were receiving some benefits from government or hospital side. No depressive symptoms were reported by 25% caregivers, while 37% reported mild and 38% moderate to severe depressive symptoms. No anxiety symptoms were reported by 33%, while 50% reported mild and 17% moderate to severe anxiety symptoms. No association was seen between gender of the caregiver and depressive or anxiety symptoms. Significantly higher financial and social burden was seen in cerebral palsy and cancer groups vis-a-vis other diseases, being least in thalassemia. Disruption of routine life was highest in cancer group caregivers followed by those in cerebral palsy group. Conclusion…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caregivers of children with cancer experience stressful events, the most common of which are poor health, caregiver burden and burnout.
“caregivers of such children experience a host of stressful events, the most common of which are poor health [11], caregiver burden and burnout [12,13]”
From Psychosocial Factors Predicting Resilience in Family Caregivers of Children with Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Khanna, A. K., Prabhakaran, A., Patel, P., Ganjiwale, J. D., & Nimbalkar, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Pramukhswami Medical College (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Nimbalkar, Somashekhar M.
- Venue
- The Indian Journal of Pediatrics
- Published
- 2015-05-15
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1006-1011
- ISSN
- 0019-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 0973-7693
- OpenAlex
- W306649893
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Indian Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
- Keywords
- caregiver burden, children with chronic illness, financial burden, social burden, psychological burden, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, cerebral palsy, childhood cancer, thalassemia, caregiver mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review