Cited by 116Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Hominid Brain Evolution: Testing Climatic, Ecological, and Social Competition Models

Bailey, Drew H., Geary, David C.·2009·Human Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12110-008-9054-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 116

Authors
Bailey, D. H., & Geary, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Geary, David C.
Venue
Human Nature
Published
2009-01-10
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
67-79
ISSN
  • 1045-6767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4776
OpenAlex
W1956999361
Cited by
116
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
39.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
hominid brain evolution, cranial capacity, brain size increase, Homo habilis, social competition, paleoclimate variability, temperature variation, population density, parasites, latitude

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review