Parent and offspring strategies in the transition at adolescence
Abstract
Adolescence signifies a transition from the use of prereproductive to reproductive strategies in the life history of Homo sapiens. Insofar as human generations overlap, events at adolescence, surrounding the onset of puberty, offer a unique glimpse into human adaptation from the point of view of the changing strategies of both parents and offspring. The timing of puberty is an important life history trait that varies between species, but also between and within the sexes in human beings. The onset of puberty marks the beginning of the reproductive life, is affected by previous experience, and serves as a trigger for behavioral change. Surbey (1988, 1990) reported relationships between father absence, heightened levels of childhood stress, and early menarche and considered them within the context of human evolutionary history. Subsequently, similar findings have been reported in a number of human populations and have been interpreted from several evolutionary perspectives. This article discusses the extent to which these and related findings regarding alterations in the timing of human puberty reflect evolved parental or offspring strategies. It entails a consideration of the applicability of the concepts of phenotypic plasticity, nonadaptive genetic variation, and conditional and alternative reproductive strategies in describing the interwoven nature of strategies employed by parent and child in the transition at adolescence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Energetic stress, including malnutrition, low energy intake, negative energy balance, and associated internal stressors such as disease, causes a developing person to shift toward a slower life-history strategy.
“energetic stress (i.e., malnutrition, low energy intake, negative energy balance, and associated internal stressors such as disease) cause the developing person to shift toward a slower LH strategy”
From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Surbey, 1998
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Surbey, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Mount Allison University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Surbey, Michele K.
- Venue
- Human Nature
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-94
- ISSN
- 1045-6767 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4776
- OpenAlex
- W1967225124
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Human Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Keywords
- adolescence, puberty onset, life history strategies, parental strategies, father absence, childhood stress, menarche, phenotypic plasticity, alternative reproductive tactics, human evolution, sex differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review