Cited by 49World Systems and Global TransformationsAnthropological Studies and InsightsHealth and Conflict Studies

Rethinking “structural violence”

Hirschfeld, Katherine·2017·Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12115-017-0116-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If a society remains in negative peace but is filled with injustice, oppression, or structural violence, it will eventually lead to the eruption of new conflicts.

    “Even if a society is in a state of non-conflict (i.e., “negative peace”), if it remains filled with injustice, oppression, or structural violence, it will eventually lead to the eruption of new conflicts (Hirschfeld, 2017).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirschfeld, K.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Hirschfeld, Katherine
Venue
Society
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
156-162
ISSN
  • 0041-1035 (ISSN-L)
  • 0147-2011
  • 1936-4725
OpenAlex
W2591221083
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
structural violence, dependency theory, international health, health disparities, poverty, colonialism, neocolonialism, Ebola outbreak, cholera outbreak, infectious disease outbreaks, postcolonial state

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review