Access to Power Versus Exercise of Power Reconceptualizing the Quality of Democracy in Latin America
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To assume Brazil as an anti-democratic state is a natural development of a patrimonialist status of the current administration.
“Then, to assume Brazil as an anti-democratic state is a natural development of a patrimonialist status of the current administration, embracing Mazzuca framework about the exercise of political power that says:”
From A "Pink Tide" Then a "Turn to the Right": Populisms and Extremism in Latin America in the Twenty-First Century (2021) · cites this paper as Mazzuca 2010
Cites
Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511781353 · Cited by 3,459 · see citing works
Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0009 · Cited by 2,132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salgado, C., & Sandrin, P. (2021) · Financial Crisis Management and Democracy · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54895-7_17 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mazzuca, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mazzuca, Sebastián L.
- Venue
- Studies in Comparative International Development
- Published
- 2010-07-17
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 334-357
- ISSN
- 0039-3606 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6167
- OpenAlex
- W2125420159
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 37.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Studies in Comparative International Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- democratization, quality of democracy, access to power, exercise of power, institutional quality, clientelism, corruption, checks and balances, patrimonialism, bureaucratization, tipping points, democratic stability, Latin America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review