Cited by 136Politics and Society in Latin AmericaPolitical Dynamics in Latin AmericaPolitical Conflict and Governance

Access to Power Versus Exercise of Power Reconceptualizing the Quality of Democracy in Latin America

Mazzuca, Sebastián L.·2010·Studies in Comparative International Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12116-010-9069-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazzuca, S. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mazzuca, Sebastián L.
Venue
Studies in Comparative International Development
Published
2010-07-17
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
334-357
ISSN
  • 0039-3606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-6167
OpenAlex
W2125420159
Cited by
136
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
37.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in Comparative International Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
democratization, quality of democracy, access to power, exercise of power, institutional quality, clientelism, corruption, checks and balances, patrimonialism, bureaucratization, tipping points, democratic stability, Latin America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review