Cited by 77Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Defining and Distinguishing Sexual and Emotional Infidelity

Guitar, Amanda E., Geher, Glenn, Kruger, Daniel J., Garcia, Justin R., Fisher, Maryanne L., Fitzgerald, Carey J.·2017·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-016-9432-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional infidelity is more complex than sexual infidelity.

    “Guitar et al., who reported that emotional infidelity is more complex than sexual infidelity [16].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Women saw emotional infidelity as carrying the potential of later sexual betrayal in partnerships.

    “Particularly, women saw emotional infidelity as carrying the potential of later sexual betrayal in such partnerships.”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Participants' responses indicated that emotional infidelity included themes such as love and betrayal along with sexual infidelity and/or intentions to have sexual relations with someone outside the pair bond.

    “Participants’ responses indicated that emotional infidelity included themes such as love and betrayal along with sexual infidelity and/or intentions to have sexual relations with someone outside the pair bond.”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guitar, A. E., Geher, G., Kruger, D. J., Garcia, J. R., Fisher, M. L., & Fitzgerald, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • SUNY New Paltz (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Saint Mary's University (CA)
  • University of South Carolina Beaufort (US)
Corresponding author
Guitar, Amanda E.
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2016-03-10
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
434-446
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W2295554250
Cited by
77
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
sexual infidelity, emotional infidelity, interpersonal relationships, gender differences, deception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review