Examining the 'attractiveness halo effect' across cultures
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evidence on the impact of ethnicity on the attractiveness halo effect is inconsistent.
“Therefore, the evidence in this regard is inconsistent and additional research would be needed to shed light on this matter.”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The attractiveness halo effect does generalize when evaluating members of an ethnicity other than their own.
“Therefore, we conclude that the attractiveness halo effect does generalize when evaluating members of an ethnicity other than their own, in alignment with the findings reported in [22].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature.
“The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature on this cognitive bias, such as [4,6,8,9,22,53,60–63].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
We opted to use a 7-point Likert scale because they have been reported to be the most accurate and reliable.
“While some work collected these ratings on a 9-point Likert scale [22], we opted to use a 7-point Likert scale because they have been reported to be the most accurate and reliable [113–115], despite the popularity of 5-point scales.”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
The strength of the halo effect in physical attractiveness research
Lucker, G. W., Beane, W. E., & Helmreich, R. L. (1981) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1981.9915206 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters
Gulati, A., Martínez-Garcia, M., Fernández, D., Lozano, M. A., Lepri, B., & Oliver, N. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240882 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Batres, C., & Shiramizu, V.
- Affiliations
- Franklin & Marshall College (US)
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Batres, Carlota
- Venue
- Current Psychology
- Published
- 2022-08-25
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 25515-25519
- ISSN
- 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4733
- OpenAlex
- W4293008068
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Psychological Science Accelerator (Psychological Science Accelerator)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- physical attractiveness, cross-cultural comparison, personality traits, gender differences, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review