Cited by 69Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionPersonality Traits and Psychology

Examining the 'attractiveness halo effect' across cultures

Batres, Carlota, Shiramizu, Victor·2023·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-022-03575-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence on the impact of ethnicity on the attractiveness halo effect is inconsistent.

    “Therefore, the evidence in this regard is inconsistent and additional research would be needed to shed light on this matter.”
  • The attractiveness halo effect does generalize when evaluating members of an ethnicity other than their own.

    “Therefore, we conclude that the attractiveness halo effect does generalize when evaluating members of an ethnicity other than their own, in alignment with the findings reported in [22].”
  • The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature.

    “The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature on this cognitive bias, such as [4,6,8,9,22,53,60–63].”
  • We opted to use a 7-point Likert scale because they have been reported to be the most accurate and reliable.

    “While some work collected these ratings on a 9-point Likert scale [22], we opted to use a 7-point Likert scale because they have been reported to be the most accurate and reliable [113–115], despite the popularity of 5-point scales.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batres, C., & Shiramizu, V.
Affiliations
  • Franklin & Marshall College (US)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Batres, Carlota
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2022-08-25
Volume
42
Issue
29
Pages
25515-25519
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W4293008068
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Psychological Science Accelerator (Psychological Science Accelerator)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
physical attractiveness, cross-cultural comparison, personality traits, gender differences, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review