Cited by 10Solar and Space Plasma DynamicsSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsStock Market Forecasting Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel residual hybrid machine learning for solar activity prediction in smart cities

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12145-023-01130-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Abba SI et al (2020) Hybrid machine learning ensemble techniques for modeling dissolved oxygen concentration. IEEE Access 8(September):157218–157237. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017743 · DOI
  2. Abdel-Rahman HI, Marzouk BA (2018) Statistical method to predict the sunspots number. NRIAG J Astron Geophys 7(2):175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2018.08.001 · DOI
  3. Abdulkadir RA, Ali SIA, Abba SI, Esmaili P (2020) Forecasting of daily rainfall at ercan airport northern Cyprus A comparison of linear and non-linear models Desalination. Water Treat 177(May 2019):297–305. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25321 · DOI
  4. Ahluwalia HS (2022) Forecast for sunspot cycle 25 activity. Adv Space Res 69(1):794–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.035 · DOI
  5. Aravazhi A (2021) Hybrid machine learning models for forecasting surgical case volumes at a hospital. AI 2:512–526 · DOI
  6. Arfianti UI, Novitasari DCR, Widodo N, Hafiyusholeh Moh, Utami WD (2021) Sunspot number prediction using gated recurrent unit (GRU) Algorithm. IJCCS Indones J Comput Cybern Syst 15(2):141. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.63676 · DOI
  7. Arun Kumar KE, Kalaga DV, Mohan Sai Kumar C, Kawaji M, Brenza TM (2022) Comparative analysis of Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), long Short-Term memory (LSTM) cells, autoregressive Integrated moving average (ARIMA), seasonal autoregressive Integrated moving average (SARIMA) for forecasting COVID-19 trends”. Alex Eng J 61(10):7585–7603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.01110.1016/j.aej.2022.01.011 · DOI
  8. Bannani FK, Sharif TA, Ben-Khalifa AOR (2006) Estimation of monthly average solar radiation in Libya. Theor Appl Climatol 83(1–4):211–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-005-0157-9 · DOI
  9. Benson B, Pan WD, Prasad A, Gary GA, Hu Q (2020) Forecasting solar cycle 25 using deep neural networks. Sol Phys 295(5):. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01634-y. · DOI
  10. Dani T, Sulistiani S (2019) Prediction of maximum amplitude of solar cycle 25 using machine learning. J Phys Conf Ser 1231(1):. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1231/1/012022. · DOI
  11. De Jager C (2005) Solar forcing of climate. 1: Solar variability. Space Sci Rev 120(3–4):197–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-7046-5 · DOI
  12. Du Z (2022) Predicting the maximum amplitude of solar cycle 25 using the early value of the rising phase. Sol Phys 297(5):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-01991-w · DOI
  13. Ghazal TM et al (2021) Hep-pred: Hepatitis C staging prediction using fine gaussian SVM. Comput Mater Continua 69(1):191–203. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.015436 · DOI
  14. Ghazal TM et al. (2021) IoT for smart cities: Machine learning approaches in smart healthcare—A review. Future Internet 13(8):. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13080218 MDPI AG · DOI
  15. Gkana A, Zachilas L (2015) Sunspot numbers data analysis, predictions and economic impacts”. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 81:79–85. https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.081.14 · DOI
  16. Hathaway DH (2010) The solar cycle. Living Rev Sol Phys 7(1):57–75. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2010-1 · DOI
  17. Hossain Lipu MS et al. (2022) Deep learning enabled state of charge, state of health and remaining useful life estimation for smart battery management system: Methods, implementations, issues and prospects. J Energy Storage 55:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105752 Elsevier Ltd · DOI
  18. Khan T, Arafat F, Mojumdar MU, Rajbongshi A, Siddiquee SMT, Chakraborty NR (2020) A Machine learning approach for predicting the sunspot of solar cycle, In 2020 11th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT49239.2020.9225427. · DOI
  19. Kirov B, Asenovski S, Georgieva K, Obridko VN, Maris-Muntean G (2018) Forecasting the sunspot maximum through an analysis of geomagnetic activity. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 176:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.12.016 · DOI
  20. Lauret P, Voyant C, Soubdhan T, David M, Poggi P (2015) A benchmarking of machine learning techniques for solar radiation forecasting in an insular context. Solar Energy 112:446–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.12.014 · DOI
  21. Lee T (2020) EMD and LSTM hybrid deep learning model for predicting sunspot number time series with a cyclic pattern. Sol Phys 295(6):. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01653-9. · DOI
  22. Lipu MSH et al (2021) Artificial intelligence based hybrid forecasting approaches for wind power generation: Progress, challenges and prospects. IEEE Access 9:102460–102489. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097102 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Liu Y, Guan L, Hou C, Han H, Liu Z, Sun Y (2019) applied sciences wind power short-term prediction based on LSTM and discrete wavelet transform. Appl Sci 9(108):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061108 · DOI
  24. Liu Z, Zhang T, Wang H (2021) Predicting sunspot numbers based on inverse number and intelligent fixed point. Sol Phys 296:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01835-z · DOI
  25. Liu J, Zhao J, Lin H (2019) Prediction of the sunspot number with a new model based on the revised data. Sol Phys 294(11):. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1536-1. · DOI
  26. Memon I, Shaikh RA, Hasan MK, Hassan R, Haq AU, Zainol KA (2020) Protect mobile travelers information in sensitive region based on fuzzy logic in IoT technology. Sec Commun Netw 2020:. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8897098. · DOI
  27. Nghiem TL, Le VD, Le TL, Marechal P, Delahaye D, Vidosavljevic A (2022) Applying Bayesian inference in a hybrid CNN-LSTM model for time-series prediction,” In: 2022 International Conference on Multimedia Analysis and Pattern Recognition, MAPR 2022 - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAPR56351.2022.9924783. · DOI
  28. Novitasari DCR, Ardhiyah N, Widodo N (2019) Flare Identification by forecasting sunspot numbers using fuzzy time series markov chain model, In: Proceedings - 2019 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Application, ISITIA 2019, pp. 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA.2019.8937242 · DOI
  29. Pala Z, Atici R (2019) Forecasting sunspot time series using deep learning methods. Sol Phys 294(5):. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1434-6 · DOI
  30. Panigrahi S, Pattanayak RM, Sethy PK, Behera SK (2021) Forecasting of sunspot time series using a hybridization of arima, ETS and SVM methods. Sol Phys 296(1):. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01757-2. · DOI
  31. Parsapoor M, Bilstrup U, Svensson B (2018) Forecasting solar activity with computational intelligence models. IEEE Access 6:70902–70909. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2867516 · DOI
  32. Qing X, Niu Y (2018) Hourly day-ahead solar irradiance prediction using weather forecasts by LSTM. Energy 148:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.177 · DOI
  33. Safiullin N, Porshnev S, Kleeorin, N (2018) Monthly sunspot numbers forecast with artificial neural network combined with dynamo model: Comparison with modern methods, In: Proceedings - 2018 Ural Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology, USBEREIT, pp. 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1109/USBEREIT.2018.8384584 · DOI
  34. Shao YE (2014) Body fat percentage prediction using intelligent hybrid approaches. Sci World J 2014:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/383910 · DOI
  35. SILSO World Data Center (2021) The international sunspot number. In: International Sunspot Number Monthly Bulletin and online catalogue, pp. 1749–2020
  36. Staudemeyer RC, Morris ER (2019) Understanding LSTM -- a tutorial into Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv, vol. 1909.09586, pp. 1–42
  37. Wang Z, Xu Z, He J, Delingette H, Fan J (2023) Long short-term memory neural equalizer. IEEE Trans Sign Power Integr 2:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsipi.2023.3242855 · DOI
  38. Wu J, Yang H (2015) Linear regression-based efficient SVM learning for large-scale classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(10):2357–2369. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2382123 · DOI
  39. Xu T, Wu J, Sen Wu Z, Li Q (2008) Long-term sunspot number prediction based on EMD analysis and AR model”. Chin J Astron Astrophys 8(3):337–342. https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-9271/8/3/10 · DOI
  40. Yaseen ZM, Ramal MM, Diop L, Jaafar O, Demir V, Kisi O (2018) Hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy models for water quality index estimation. Water Resources Manag 32(7):2227–2245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1915-7 · DOI
  41. Yu G, Feng H, Feng S, Zhao J, Xu J (2021) Forecasting hand-foot-and-mouth disease cases using wavelet-based SARIMA – NNAR hybrid model. PLoS One 16(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246673 · DOI
  42. Yule U (1927) On a method of investigating periodicities disturbed series, with special reference to Wolfer’s sunspot numbers. Phil Trans R Soc A.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1927.0007 · DOI
  43. Zhang B, Sun L, Wang W (2022) Two stage prediction model of sunspots monthly value based on CEEMDAN and particle swarm optimization ELM. IEEE Access 10:102981–102991. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3206542 · DOI
  44. Zhu H, Chen H, Zhu W, He M (2023) Predicting Solar cycle 25 using an optimized long short-term memory model based on sunspot area data. Adv Space Res.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.01.042 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Abdulkadir, R. A., Hasan, M. K., Islam, S., Gadekallu, T. R., Pandey, B., Safie, N., Syväjärvi, M., & Nasor, M.
Affiliations
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
  • UCSI University (MY)
  • Lovely Professional University (IN)
  • Texas A&M University-Victoria (US)
  • Ajman University (AE)
Corresponding author
  • Hasan, Mohammad Kamrul
  • Islam, Shayla
Venue
Earth Science Informatics
Published
2023-11-01
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
3931-3945
ISSN
  • 1865-0473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-0481
OpenAlex
W4388134667
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earth Science Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (DIP 2022-021)
  • Swedish Energy Agency and and European Commission (775970)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Keywords
solar activity forecasting, hybrid machine learning, support vector machine, long short-term memory neural network, linear regression, smart cities, space weather, computational complexity reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review