The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review
Open accessAbstract
In Europe and the United States, there is an increasing prevalence of the use of autologous blood products to facilitate healing in a variety of applications. Recently, we have learned more about specific growth factors, which play a crucial role in the healing process. With that knowledge there is abundant enthusiasm in the application of concentrated platelets, which release a supra-maximal quantity of these growth factors to stimulate recovery in non-healing injuries. For 20 years, the application of autologous PRP has been safely used and documented in many fields including; orthopedics, sports medicine, dentistry, ENT, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, urology, wound healing, cosmetic, cardiothoracic, and maxillofacial surgery. This article introduces the reader to PRP therapy and reviews the current literature on this emerging treatment modality. In summary, PRP provides a promising alternative to surgery by promoting safe and natural healing. However, there are few controlled trials, and mostly anecdotal or case reports. Additionally the sample sizes are frequently small, limiting the generalization of the findings. Recently, there is emerging literature on the beneficial effects of PRP for chronic non-healing tendon injuries including lateral epicondylitis and plantar fasciitis and cartilage degeneration (Mishra and Pavelko, The American Journal of Sports Medicine 10(10):1-5, 2006; Barrett and Erredge, Podiatry Today 17:37-42, 2004). However, as clinical use increases, more controlled studies are needed to further understand this treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anitua, E., Sanchez, M., Nurden, A. T., Zalduendo, M., de la Fuente, M., Orive, G., Azofra, J., & Andia, I. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30585 · Cited by 188
Cited by
Cerza, F., Carnì, S., Carcangiu, A., Di Vavo, I., Schiavilla, V., Pecora, A., De Biasi, G., & Ciuffreda, M. (2012) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546512461902 · Cited by 432
Chen, X., Jones, I. A., Park, C., & Vangsness, C. T. (2018) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546517743746 · Cited by 294
Jo, C. H., Kim, J. E., Yoon, K. S., & Shin, S. (2012) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546512437525 · Cited by 248
Current advances in the treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis
Tarpada, S. P., Morris, M. T., Lian, J., & Rashidi, S. (2018) · Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1016/j.jor.2018.01.040 · Cited by 69
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection in Sports Injuries
Arumugam, S., Prakash, A., Janani, G., Vignesh, M., Anjanavannan, M. M., Perumal, S., & Alwar, T. (2021) · Indian Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s43465-020-00349-3 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Sampson, S., Gerhardt, M., & Mandelbaum, B.
- Venue
- Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
- Published
- 2008-07-16
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 165-174
- ISSN
- 1935-973X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-9748
- OpenAlex
- W2124525370
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 156.59
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12178-008-9032-5
- The paper
- Sampson, S., Gerhardt, M., & Mandelbaum, B. (2008). Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-008-9032-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.