Cited by 94Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The RUNX1–PU.1 axis in the control of hematopoiesis

Open access
Imperato, Maria Rosaria, Cauchy, Pierre, Obier, Nadine, Bonifer, Constanze·2015·International Journal of Hematology

Abstract

The differentiation from multipotent hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) to mature and functional blood cells requires the finely tuned regulation of gene expression at each stage of development. Specific transcription factors play a key role in this process as they modulate the expression of their target genes in an exquisitely lineage-specific manner. A large number of important transcriptional regulators have been identified which establish and maintain specific gene expression patterns during hematopoietic development. Hematopoiesis is therefore a paradigm for investigating how transcription factors function in mammalian cells, thanks also to the evolution of genome-wide and the next-generation sequencing technologies. In this review, we focus on the current knowledge of the biological and functional properties of the hematopoietic master regulator RUNX1 (also known as AML1, CBFA2, PEBP2aB) transcription factor and its main downstream target PU.1. We will outline their relationship in determining the fate of the myeloid lineage during normal stem cell development and under conditions when hematopoietic development is subverted by leukemic transformation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12185-015-1762-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PU.1 action is important or indispensable for sustained generation of all known hematopoietic precursors with lymphoid developmental potentials.

    “its action is also important or indispensable for sustained generation of all known hematopoietic precursors that have lymphoid developmental potentials (1–9).”

    From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    The sections “Developmental-stage-specific RUNX1 and PU.1 function” and “RUNX1 and PU.1 in T and B-cells” (page numbers unavailable) describe PU.1’s contribution to HSC maintenance and its importance in early T-cell development and B-cell progenitor formation. They do not establish that PU.1 is important or indispensable for the sustained generation of *all known* hematopoietic precursors with lymphoid potential. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In pro-T cells, a key positive regulatory partner of PU.1 is Runx1, which has long been known to interact with PU.1 to form a functional complex at myeloid positive regulatory target sites.

    “For PU.1 in pro-T cells, IRF and C/EBP family partners are mostly not available, but a key positive regulatory partner is Runx1 (previously known as AML1 or CBFα2), which has long been known to interact with PU.1 (and C/EBPα) to form a functional complex at its myeloid positive regulatory target sites (9, 112, 113).”

    From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    The ‘Developmental-stage-specific RUNX1 and PU.1 function’ section says RUNX1 and PU.1 form a synergistic complex in myeloid cells that regulates lineage-specific genes. The ‘RUNX1 and PU.1 in T and B-cells’ section discusses each factor’s role in early T-cell development but does not establish that RUNX1 is a key positive partner of PU.1 in pro-T cells. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 94

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. Bonifer C, Bowen DT. Epigenetic mechanisms regulating nor- mal and malignant haematopoiesis: new therapeutic targets for clinical medicine. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2010;12:e6.
  2. Thornell A, Hallberg B, Grundstrom T. Differential protein binding in lymphocytes to a sequence in the enhancer of the mouse retrovirus SL3-3. Mol Cell Biol. 1988;8:1625-37.
  3. Kamachi Y, Ogawa E, Asano M, Ishida S, Murakami Y, Satake M, Ito Y, Shigesada K. Purification of a mouse nuclear fac- tor that binds to both the A and B cores of the polyomavirus enhancer. J Virol. 1990;64:4808-19.
  4. Boral AL, Okenquist SA, Lenz J. Identification of the SL3-3 virus enhancer core as a T-lymphoma cell-specific element. J Virol. 1989;63:76-84.
  5. Wang SW, Speck NA. Purification of core-binding factor, a pro- tein that binds the conserved core site in murine leukemia virus enhancers. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:89-102.
  6. Wang S, Wang Q, Crute BE, Melnikova IN, Keller SR, Speck NA. Cloning and characterization of subunits of the T-cell receptor and murine leukemia virus enhancer core-binding fac- tor. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:3324-39.
  7. Miyoshi H, Shimizu K, Kozu T, Maseki N, Kaneko Y, Ohki M. t[8, 21] breakpoints on chromosome 21 in acute myeloid leu- kemia are clustered within a limited region of a single gene, AML1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:10431-4.
  8. Daga A, Tighe JE, Calabi F. Leukaemia/Drosophila homology. Nature. 1992;356:484.
  9. Erickson P, Gao J, Chang KS, Look T, Whisenant E, Raimondi S, Lasher R, Trujillo J, Rowley J, Drabkin H. Identification of breakpoints in t[8, 21] acute myelogenous leukemia and isola- tion of a fusion transcript, AML1/ETO, with similarity to Dros- ophila segmentation gene, runt. Blood. 1992;80:1825-31.
  10. Meyers S, Downing JR, Hiebert SW. Identification of AML-1 and the [8, 21] translocation protein (AML-1/ETO) as sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins: the runt homology domain is required for DNA binding and protein-protein inter- actions. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:6336-45.
  11. Ghozi MC, Bernstein Y, Negreanu V, Levanon D, Groner Y. Expression of the human acute myeloid leukemia gene AML1 is regulated by two promoter regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:1935-40.
  12. Goyama S, Huang G, Kurokawa M, Mulloy JC. Posttransla- tional modifications of RUNX1 as potential anticancer targets. Oncogene. 2014. doi:10.1038/onc.2014.305. · DOI
  13. Hoogenkamp M, Krysinska H, Ingram R, Huang G, Barlow R, Clarke D, Ebralidze A, Zhang P, Tagoh H, Cockerill PN, et al. The PU.1 locus is differentially regulated at the level of chro- matin structure and noncoding transcription by alternate mecha- nisms at distinct developmental stages of hematopoiesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:7425-38.
  14. Moreau-Gachelin F, Tavitian A, Tambourin P. Spi-1 is a putative oncogene in virally induced murine erythroleukaemias. Nature. 1988;331:277-80.
  15. Klemsz MJ, McKercher SR, Celada A, Van Beveren C, Maki RA. The macrophage and B cell-specific transcription factor PU.1 is related to the ETS oncogene. Cell. 1990;61:113-24.
  16. DeVilbiss AW, Sanalkumar R, Johnson KD, Keles S, Bresnick EH. Hematopoietic transcriptional mechanisms: from locus- specific to genome-wide vantage points. Exp Hematol. 2014;42:618-29.
  17. Wang Q, Stacy T, Binder M, Marin-Padilla M, Sharpe AH, Speck NA. Disruption of the CBFA2 gene causes necrosis and hemorrhaging in the central nervous system and blocks defini- tive hematopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:3444-9.
  18. Wang Q, Stacy T, Miller JD, Lewis AF, Gu TL, Huang X, Bush- weller JH, Bories JC, Alt FW, Ryan G, et al. The CBFbeta subu- nit is essential for CBFalpha2 (AML1) function in vivo. Cell. 1996;87:697-708.
  19. Bresciani E, Carrington B, Wincovitch S, Jones M, Gore AV, Weinstein BM, Sood R, Liu PP. CBFbeta and RUNX1 are required at 2 different steps during the development of hemat- opoietic stem cells in zebrafish. Blood. 2014;124:70-8.
  20. Okuda T, van Deursen J, Hiebert SW, Grosveld G, Downing JR. AML1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in human leukemia, is essential for normal fetal liver hematopoie- sis. Cell. 1996;84:321-30.
  21. Putz G, Rosner A, Nuesslein I, Schmitz N, Buchholz F. AML1 deletion in adult mice causes splenomegaly and lymphomas. Oncogene. 2006;25:929-39.
  22. Chen MJ, Yokomizo T, Zeigler BM, Dzierzak E, Speck NA. Runx1 is required for the endothelial to haematopoietic cell transition but not thereafter. Nature. 2009;457:887-91.
  23. Ichikawa M, Goyama S, Asai T, Kawazu M, Nakagawa M, Takeshita M, Chiba S, Ogawa S, Kurokawa M. AML1/Runx1 negatively regulates quiescent hematopoietic stem cells in adult hematopoiesis. J Immunol. 2008;180:4402-8.
  24. Scott EW, Simon MC, Anastasi J, Singh H. Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hemat- opoietic lineages. Science. 1994;265:1573-7.
  25. McKercher SR, Torbett BE, Anderson KL, Henkel GW, Vestal DJ, Baribault H, Klemsz M, Feeney AJ, Wu GE, Paige CJ, et al. Targeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hemat- opoietic abnormalities. EMBO J. 1996;15:5647-58.
  26. Wilkinson AC, Kawata VK, Schutte J, Gao X, Antoniou S, Bau- mann C, Woodhouse S, Hannah R, Tanaka Y, Swiers G, et al. Single-cell analyses of regulatory network perturbations using enhancer-targeting TALEs suggest novel roles for PU.1 during haematopoietic specification. Development. 2014;141:4018-30.
  27. Lancrin C, Mazan M, Stefanska M, Patel R, Lichtinger M, Costa G, Vargel O, Wilson NK, Moroy T, Bonifer C, et al. GFI1 and GFI1B control the loss of endothelial identity of hemo- genic endothelium during hematopoietic commitment. Blood. 2012;120:314-22.
  28. Medvinsky A, Rybtsov S, Taoudi S. Embryonic origin of the adult hematopoietic system: advances and questions. Develop- ment. 2011;138:1017-31.
  29. Medvinsky A, Dzierzak E. Definitive hematopoiesis is autono- mously initiated by the AGM region. Cell. 1996;86:897-906.
  30. Kissa K, Herbomel P. Blood stem cells emerge from aor- tic endothelium by a novel type of cell transition. Nature. 2010;464:112-5.
  31. Lancrin C, Sroczynska P, Stephenson C, Allen T, Kouskoff V, Lacaud G. The haemangioblast generates haematopoi- etic cells through a haemogenic endothelium stage. Nature. 2009;457:892-5.
  32. Eilken HM, Nishikawa S, Schroeder T. Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium. Nature. 2009;457:896-900.
  33. Moignard V, Woodhouse S, Fisher J, Gottgens B. Transcrip- tional hierarchies regulating early blood cell development. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2013;51:239-47.
  34. Swiers G, Baumann C, O'Rourke J, Giannoulatou E, Taylor S, Joshi A, Moignard V, Pina C, Bee T, Kokkaliaris KD, et al. Early dynamic fate changes in haemogenic endothelium charac- terized at the single-cell level. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2924.
  35. Lichtinger M, Ingram R, Hannah R, Muller D, Clarke D, Assi SA, Lie ALM, Noailles L, Vijayabaskar MS, Wu M, et al. RUNX1 reshapes the epigenetic landscape at the onset of hae- matopoiesis. EMBO J. 2012;31:4318-33.
  36. Staber PB, Zhang P, Ye M, Welner RS, Nombela-Arrieta C, Bach C, Kerenyi M, Bartholdy BA, Zhang H, Alberich-Jorda M, et al. Sustained PU.1 levels balance cell-cycle regulators to prevent exhaustion of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Mol Cell. 2013;49:934-46.
  37. Rieger MA, Hoppe PS, Smejkal BM, Eitelhuber AC, Schroeder T. Hematopoietic cytokines can instruct lineage choice. Sci- ence. 2009;325:217-8.
  38. Mossadegh-Keller N, Sarrazin S, Kandalla PK, Espinosa L, Stanley ER, Nutt SL, Moore J, Sieweke MH. M-CSF instructs myeloid lineage fate in single haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2013;497:239-43.
  39. Heath V, Suh HC, Holman M, Renn K, Gooya JM, Parkin S, Klarmann KD, Ortiz M, Johnson P, Keller J. C/EBPalpha defi- ciency results in hyperproliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells and disrupts macrophage development in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2004;104:1639-47.
  40. Zhang DE, Zhang P, Wang ND, Hetherington CJ, Darlington GJ, Tenen DG. Absence of granulocyte colony-stimulating fac- tor signaling and neutrophil development in CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:569-74.
  41. Yeamans C, Wang D, Paz-Priel I, Torbett BE, Tenen DG, Friedman AD. C/EBPalpha binds and activates the PU.1 dis- tal enhancer to induce monocyte lineage commitment. Blood. 2007;110:3136-42.
  42. Nakajima H, Asai A, Okada A, Ping L, Hamajima F, Sata T, Isobe K. Transcriptional regulation of ILT family receptors. J Immunol. 2003;171:6611-20.
  43. Yu M, Mazor T, Huang H, Huang HT, Kathrein KL, Woo AJ, Chouinard CR, Labadorf A, Akie TE, Moran TB, et al. Direct recruitment of polycomb repressive complex 1 to chromatin by core binding transcription factors. Mol Cell. 2012;45:330-43.
  44. Gu X, Hu Z, Ebrahem Q, Crabb JS, Mahfouz RZ, Radi- voyevitch T, Crabb JW, Saunthararajah Y. Runx1 regulation of PU.1 corepressor/coactivator exchange identifies specific molecular targets for leukemia differentiation therapy. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:14881-95.
  45. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, Cheng JX, Murre C, Singh H, Glass CK. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regula- tory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576-89.
  46. Ghisletti S, Barozzi I, Mietton F, Polletti S, De Santa F, Ven- turini E, Gregory L, Lonie L, Chew A, Wei CL, et al. Identifi- cation and characterization of enhancers controlling the inflam- matory gene expression program in macrophages. Immunity. 2010;32:317-28.
  47. Lavin Y, Winter D, Blecher-Gonen R, David E, Keren-Shaul H, Merad M, Jung S, Amit I. Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell. 2014;159:1312-26.
  48. Gosselin D, Link VM, Romanoski CE, Fonseca GJ, Eichenfield DZ, Spann NJ, Stender JD, Chun HB, Garner H, Geissmann F, et al. Environment drives selection and function of enhanc- ers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities. Cell. 2014;159:1327-40.
  49. Gosselin D, Glass CK. Epigenomics of macrophages. Immunol Rev. 2014;262:96-112.
  50. Egawa T, Tillman RE, Naoe Y, Taniuchi I, Littman DR. The role of the Runx transcription factors in thymocyte differ- entiation and in homeostasis of naive T cells. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1945-57.
  51. Lepoivre C, Belhocine M, Bergon A, Griffon A, Yammine M, Vanhille L, Zacarias-Cabeza J, Garibal MA, Koch F, Maqbool MA, et al. Divergent transcription is associated with promoters of transcriptional regulators. BMC Genom. 2013;14:914.
  52. Sun W, Graves BJ, Speck NA. Transactivation of the Moloney murine leukemia virus and T-cell receptor beta-chain enhancers by cbf and ets requires intact binding sites for both proteins. J Virol. 1995;69:4941-9.
  53. Wotton D, Ghysdael J, Wang S, Speck NA, Owen MJ. Coopera- tive binding of Ets-1 and core binding factor to DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:840-50.
  54. Hayashi K, Natsume W, Watanabe T, Abe N, Iwai N, Okada H, Ito Y, Asano M, Iwakura Y, Habu S, et al. Diminution of the AML1 transcription factor function causes differential effects on the fates of CD4 and CD8 single-positive T cells. J Immunol. 2000;165:6816-24.
  55. Taniuchi I, Osato M, Egawa T, Sunshine MJ, Bae SC, Komori T, Ito Y, Littman DR. Differential requirements for Runx pro- teins in CD4 repression and epigenetic silencing during T lym- phocyte development. Cell. 2002;111:621-33.
  56. Woolf E, Xiao C, Fainaru O, Lotem J, Rosen D, Negreanu V, Bernstein Y, Goldenberg D, Brenner O, Berke G, et al. Runx3 and Runx1 are required for CD8 T cell development during thy- mopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:7731-6.
  57. Durst KL, Hiebert SW. Role of RUNX family members in transcriptional repression and gene silencing. Oncogene. 2004;23:4220-4.
  58. Kohu K, Sato T, Ohno S, Hayashi K, Uchino R, Abe N, Naka- zato M, Yoshida N, Kikuchi T, Iwakura Y, et al. Overexpression of the Runx3 transcription factor increases the proportion of mature thymocytes of the CD8 single-positive lineage. J Immu- nol. 2005;174:2627-36.
  59. Carpenter AC, Bosselut R. Decision checkpoints in the thymus. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:666-73.
  60. Komine O, Hayashi K, Natsume W, Watanabe T, Seki Y, Seki N, Yagi R, Sukzuki W, Tamauchi H, Hozumi K, et al. The Runx1 transcription factor inhibits the differentiation of naive CD4 + T cells into the Th2 lineage by repressing GATA3 expression. J Exp Med. 2003;198:51-61.
  61. Naoe Y, Setoguchi R, Akiyama K, Muroi S, Kuroda M, Hatam F, Littman DR, Taniuchi I. Repression of interleukin-4 in T helper type 1 cells by RUNX/CBF beta binding to the Il4 silencer. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1749-55.
  62. Wong WF, Kohu K, Chiba T, Sato T, Satake M. Interplay of transcription factors in T-cell differentiation and function: the role of Runx. Immunology. 2011;132:157-64.
  63. Ono M, Yaguchi H, Ohkura N, Kitabayashi I, Nagamura Y, Nomura T, Miyachi Y, Tsukada T, Sakaguchi S. FOXP3 con- trols regulatory T-cell function by interacting with AML1/ RUNX1. Nature. 2007;446:685-9.
  64. Kitoh A, Ono M, Naoe Y, Ohkura N, Yamaguchi T, Yaguchi H, Kitabayashi I, Tsukada T, Nomura T, Miyachi Y, et al. Indis- pensable role of the RUNX1-CBFbeta transcription complex for in vivo-suppressive function of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. Immunity. 2009;31:609-20.
  65. Niebuhr B, Kriebitzsch N, Fischer M, Behrens K, Gunther T, Alawi M, Bergholz U, Muller U, Roscher S, Ziegler M, et al. Runx1 is essential at two stages of early murine B-cell develop- ment. Blood. 2013;122:413-23.
  66. Seo W, Ikawa T, Kawamoto H, Taniuchi I. RUNX1-CBFbeta facilitates early B lymphocyte development by regulating expression of EBF1. J Exp Med. 2012;209:1255-62.
  67. Dionne CJ, Tse KY, Weiss AH, Franco CB, Wiest DL, Anderson MK, Rothenberg EV. Subversion of T lineage commitment by PU.1 in a clonal cell line system. Dev Biol. 2005;280:448-66.
  68. Del Real MM, Rothenberg EV. Architecture of a lymphomy- eloid developmental switch controlled by PU.1, Notch and GATA3. Development. 2013;140:1207-19.
  69. DeKoter RP, Singh H. Regulation of B lymphocyte and mac- rophage development by graded expression of PU.1. Science. 2000;288:1439-41.
  70. Medina KL, Pongubala JM, Reddy KL, Lancki DW, Dekoter R, Kieslinger M, Grosschedl R, Singh H. Assembling a gene regulatory network for specification of the B cell fate. Dev Cell. 2004;7:607-17.
  71. Pui CH, Relling MV, Downing JR. Acute lymphoblastic leuke- mia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1535-48.
  72. Della Gatta G, Palomero T, Perez-Garcia A, Ambesi-Impiom- bato A, Bansal M, Carpenter ZW, De Keersmaecker K, Sole X, Xu L, Paietta E, et al. Reverse engineering of TLX oncogenic transcriptional networks identifies RUNX1 as tumor suppressor in T-ALL. Nat Med. 2012;18:436-40.
  73. Nasr MR, Rosenthal N, Syrbu S. Expression profiling of transcription factors in B-or T-acute lymphoblastic leuke- mia/lymphoma and burkitt lymphoma: usefulness of PAX5 immunostaining as pan-Pre-B-cell marker. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133:41-8.
  74. Sokalski KM, Li SK, Welch I, Cadieux-Pitre HA, Gruca MR, DeKoter RP. Deletion of genes encoding PU.1 and Spi-B in B cells impairs differentiation and induces pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2011;118:2801-8.
  75. McCune RC, Syrbu SI, Vasef MA. Expression profiling of transcription factors Pax-5, Oct-1, Oct-2, BOB.1, and PU.1 in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: a comparative study using high throughput tissue microarrays. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:1010-8.
  76. Nottingham WT, Jarratt A, Burgess M, Speck CL, Cheng JF, Prabhakar S, Rubin EM, Li PS, Sloane-Stanley J, Kong ASJ, et al. Runx1-mediated hematopoietic stem-cell emergence is controlled by a GATA/ETS/SCL-regulated enhancer. Blood. 2007;110:4188-97.
  77. Chen H, Ray-Gallet D, Zhang P, Hetherington CJ, Gonza- lez DA, Zhang DE, Moreau-Gachelin F, Tenen DG. PU.1 (Spi-1) autoregulates its expression in myeloid cells. Oncogene. 1995;11:1549-60.
  78. Ebralidze AK, Guibal FC, Steidl U, Zhang P, Lee S, Bartholdy B, Jorda MA, Petkova V, Rosenbauer F, Huang G, et al. PU.1 expression is modulated by the balance of functional sense and antisense RNAs regulated by a shared cis-regulatory element. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2085-92.
  79. Schnittger S, Dicker F, Kern W, Wendland N, Sundermann J, Alpermann T, Haferlach C, Haferlach T. RUNX1 mutations are frequent in de novo AML with noncomplex karyotype and con- fer an unfavorable prognosis. Blood. 2011;117:2348-57. 113. Mangan JK, Speck NA. RUNX1 mutations in clonal myeloid disorders: from conventional cytogenetics to next generation sequencing, a story 40 years in the making. Crit Rev Oncog. 2011;16:77-91. 114. Gaidzik VI, Bullinger L, Schlenk RF, Zimmermann AS, Rock J, Paschka P, Corbacioglu A, Krauter J, Schlegelberger B, Ganser A, et al. RUNX1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: results from a comprehensive genetic and clinical analysis from the AML study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1364-72. 115. Silva FP, Morolli B, Storlazzi CT, Anelli L, Wessels H, Bez- rookove V, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Giphart-Gassler M. Identifi- cation of RUNX1/AML1 as a classical tumor suppressor gene. Oncogene. 2003;22:538-47. 116. Osato M, Asou N, Abdalla E, Hoshino K, Yamasaki H, Okubo T, Suzushima H, Takatsuki K, Kanno T, Shigesada K, et al. Biallelic and heterozygous point mutations in the runt domain of the AML1/PEBP2alphaB gene associated with myeloblastic leukemias. Blood. 1999;93:1817-24. 117.
  80. Martens JH, Mandoli A, Simmer F, Wierenga BJ, Saeed S, Singh AA, Altucci L, Vellenga E, Stunnenberg HG. ERG and FLI1 binding sites demarcate targets for aberrant epigenetic regulation by AML1-ETO in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:4038-48. 126. Mandoli A, Singh AA, Jansen PW, Wierenga AT, Riahi H, Franci G, Prange K, Saeed S, Vellenga E, Vermeulen M, et al. CBFB-MYH11/RUNX1 together with a compendium of hemat- opoietic regulators, chromatin modifiers and basal transcription factors occupies self-renewal genes in inv[16] acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2014;28:770-8. 127. Ben-Ami O, Friedman D, Leshkowitz D, Goldenberg D, Orlovsky K, Pencovich N, Lotem J, Tanay A, Groner Y. Addic- tion of t[8, 21] and inv[] acute myeloid leukemia to native RUNX1. Cell Rep. 2013;4:1131-43. 128.

Authors
Imperato, M. R., Cauchy, P., Obier, N., & Bonifer, C.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Bonifer, Constanze
Venue
International Journal of Hematology
Published
2015-03-08
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
319-329
ISSN
  • 0925-5710 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-3774
OpenAlex
W2062896748
Cited by
94
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M009157/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I001220/2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
RUNX1, PU.1, hematopoiesis, hematopoietic stem cells, transcription factors, myeloid lineage, lineage specification, gene expression regulation, leukemic transformation
MeSH terms
Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Hematopoiesis, Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, T-Lymphocytes, Signal Transduction, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Transcriptional Activation, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic, Epigenesis, Genetic, Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review