The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Explosion Hazard Analysis of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Transportation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- BARIHA N, MISHRA I M, SRIVASTAVA V C. Fire and explosion hazard analysis during surface transport of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG): A case study of LPG truck tanker accident in Kannur, Kerala, India [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 40: 449–460. · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2016.01.020
- LANDUCCI G, TUGNOLI A, BUSINI V, et al. The viareggio LPG accident: Lessons learnt [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2011, 24(4): 466–476. · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2011.04.001
- VAN DEN BOSH C J H, WETERINGS R. Methods for the calculation of physical effects: Due to releases of hazardous materials (liquids and gases) “Yellow Book” [M]. 3rd ed. Hague: Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, 2005.
- TNO. Methods for the determination of possible damage to people and objects resulting from releases of hazardous materials (Green Book) [M]. Voorburg: The Netherlands Ocrganization of Applied Sciedtific Research, 2005.
- ERMAK D L. A description of the SLAB model[R]. Livermore: Lawrence Livermore National Lab., 1989.
- CCPS. Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases [M]. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1998.
- MARTINSEN W E, MARX J D. An improved model for the prediction of radiant heat from fireballs [C]// 1999 International Conference and Workshop on Modeling Consequences of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Materials. San Francisco: CCPS, 1999: 605–621.
- ROBERTS A F. Thermal radiation hazards from releases of LPG from pressurised storage [J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1981, 4(3): 197–212. · doi:10.1016/0379-7112(81)90018-7
- BAKER W E, KULESZ J J, RICKER R E, et al. Workbook for predicting pressure wave and fragment effect of exploding propellent tanks and gas storage vessels [R]. San Antonio: NASA, 1977.
- MERCX W P M, VAN DEN BERG A C, VAN LEEUWEN D. Application of correlations to quantify the source strength of vapour cloud explosions in realistic situations. Final report for the project: ‘GAMES’ [R]. Rijswijk: TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory, 1998.
- NIELSEN D S. Validation of two-phase outflow model [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1991, 4(4): 236–241. · doi:10.1016/0950-4230(91)85006-f
- ERMAK D L, CHAN S T, MORGAN D L, et al. A comparison of dense gas dispersion model simulations with burro series LNG spill test results [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1982, 6(1/2): 129–160. · doi:10.1016/0304-3894(82)80037-x
- SELBY C A, BURGAN B A. Joint industry project on blast and fire engineering for topside structures phase 2 [R]. London: The Steel Construction Institute, 1998.
- HARDEE H C, LEE D O. A simple conduction model for skin burns resulting from exposure to chemical fireballs [J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1978, 1(3): 199–205. · doi:10.1016/0379-7112(78)90005-x
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, S., Hao, L., Zhu, Z., & Wei, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science)
- Published
- 2022-12-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 252-260
- ISSN
- 1007-1172
- 1995-8188
- Cited by
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explosion Hazard Analysis of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Transportation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12204-022-2536-0
- The paper
- Gao, S., Hao, L., Zhu, Z., & Wei, H. (2024). Explosion Hazard Analysis of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Transportation. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-022-2536-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
