CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Secondary Forests on Anthropogenic Soils of the Middle Madeira River: Valuation, Local Knowledge, and Landscape Domestication in Brazilian Amazonia

Junqueira, André Braga, Shepard, Glenn Harvey, Clement, Charles R.·2011·Economic Botany
DOI 10.1007/s12231-010-9138-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12231-010-9138-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Abraão, M. B., B. W. Nelson, J. C. Baniwa, D. W. Yu, and G. H., Jr. Shepard. 2008. Ethnobotanical ground-truthing: Indigenous knowledge, floristic inventories and satellite imagery in the upper Rio Negro, Brazil. Journal of Biogeography 35:2237–2248. · DOI
  2. Albuquerque, U. P. and R. F. P. Lucena. 2005. Can apparency affect the use of plants by local people in tropical forests? Interciencia 30:506–511.
  3. Alexiades, M. N. 1996. Collecting ethnobotanical data: An introduction to basic concepts and techniques. Pages 53–94 in M. N. Alexiades, ed., Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: A field manual. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
  4. Anderson, A. B. 1977. Os nomes e os usos de palmeiras entre uma tribo de índios Yanomama. Acta Amazonica 7(1):5–13. · DOI
  5. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group - APGII. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436. · DOI
  6. Arroyo-Kalin, M., E. G. Neves, and W. I. Woods. 2009. Anthropogenic dark earths of the Central Amazon region: Remarks on their evolution and polygenetic composition. Pages 99–125 in W. G. Woods, J. Lehmann, C. Steiner, and A. Winklerprins, eds., Terra Preta Nova: A tribute to Wim Sombroek. Springer, Berlin.
  7. Balick, M. J. 1986. Palms and development in the humid tropics. Anais do 1º simpósio do trópico úmido. Volume VI:121–140.
  8. Barcelos, E. 1986. Características genético-ecológicas de populações naturais de caiaué [Elaeis oleifera (H.B.K.) Cortés] na Amazônia Brasileira. Dissertation, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia / Fundação Universidade do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
  9. Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton. · DOI
  10. ———, D. Breedlove, and P. Raven. 1974. Principles of Tzeltal plant classification: An introduction to the botanical ethnography of a Mayan-speaking people of Highland Chiapas. Academic Press, New York.
  11. Bernard, H. R. 1988. Research methods in cultural anthropology. Sage, Newbury Park.
  12. Borgatti, S. P. 1999. Elicitation techniques for cultural domain analysis. Pages 115–151 in J. Schensul, M. LeCompte, B. Nastasi, and S. Borgatti, eds., Enhanced ethnographic methods: Audiovisual techniques, focused group interviews and elicitation techniques. Ethnographer’s Toolkit, Vol. 3. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek.
  13. Budowsky, G. 1988. Is sustainable harvest possible in the tropics? American Forests November/December 34–37:79–81.
  14. Campos, M. T. and C. Ehringhaus. 2003. Plant virtues are in the eyes of the beholders: A comparison of known palm uses among indigenous and folk communities of southwestern Amazonia. Economic Botany 57(3):324–344. · DOI
  15. Campbell, D. G., A. Ford, K. Lowell, J. Walker, J. K. Lake, C. Ocampo-Raeder, A. Townesmith, and M. Balick. 2006. The feral forests of the Eastern Petén. Pages 21–25 in W. Balée and C. L. Erickson, eds., Time and complexity in historical ecology: Studies in the neotropical lowlands. Columbia University Press, New York. · DOI
  16. Chambers, R. and M. Leach. 1989. Trees as savings and security for the rural poor. World Development 17(3):329–342. · DOI
  17. Chazdon, R. L. and F. Coe. 1999. Ethnobotany of woody species in second-growth, old-growth and selectively logged forests of Costa Rica. Conservation Biology 13:1312–1322. · DOI
  18. Clement, C. R. 1999. 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources: I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. Economic Botany 53(2):188–202. · DOI
  19. ———, J. M. McCann, and N. J. H. Smith. 2003. Agrobiodiversity in Amazonia and its relationships with Dark Earths. Pages 159–178 in J. Lehmann, D. Kern, B. Glaser, and W. Woods, eds., Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  20. ———, M. P. Klüppel, L. A. German, S. S. Almeida, J. Major, L. E. O. C. Aragão, J. C. Guix, E. Lleras, A. M. G. A. WinklerPrins, S. B. Hecht, and J. M. McCann. 2009. Diversidade vegetal em solos antrópicos na Amazônia. Pages 146–161 in W. G. Teixeira, D. C. Kern, B. Mádari, H. N. Lima, and W. Woods, eds., As Terras Pretas de Índio na Amazônia: Sua caracterização e uso deste conhecimento na criação de novas areas. Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, Manaus.
  21. Coomes, O. T., F. Grimard, and G. J. Burt. 2000. Tropical forests and shifting cultivation: Secondary forest fallow dynamics among traditional farmers of the Peruvian Amazon. Ecological Economics 32:109–124. · DOI
  22. Corlett, R. T. 1995. Tropical secondary forests. Progress in Physical Geography 19(2):159–172. · DOI
  23. Cunningham, A. B. 2001. Applied ethnobotany: People, wild plant use and conservation. People and Plants Conservation Manual. Earthscan Publications, London.
  24. Dufrene, M. and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible assymetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67:345–366.
  25. Eden, M. J., W. Bray, L. F. Herrera, and C. McEwan. 1984. Terra preta soils and their archaeological context in the Caquetá Basin of southeast Colombia. American Antiquity 49:125–140. · DOI
  26. Eletronorte. 1992. Archaeology in the hydroelectric projects of Eletronorte: Preliminary results. Eletronorte, Brasília.
  27. Erickson, C. L. 2008. Amazonia: The historical ecology of a domesticated landscape. Pages 157–184 in H. Silverman and W. Isbell, eds., Handbook of South American Archaeology. Springer, New York. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Finegan, B. 1992. The management potential of neotropical secondary lowland rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management 47:295–321. · DOI
  29. Ford, A. and R. Nigh. 2009. Origins of the Maya forest garden: Maya resource management. Journal of Ethnobiology 29:213–236. · DOI
  30. Fraser, J. A. and C. R. Clement. 2008. Dark Earths and manioc cultivation in Central Amazonia: A window on pre-Columbian agricultural systems? Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Ciências Humanas 3:175–194. · DOI
  31. ——— and A. B. Junqueira. 2010. How important is a use? Critical reflections on the conceptualizations of use and importance in quantitative ethnobotany. Pages 113–126 in U. P. Albuquerque and N. Hanazaki, eds., Recent developments and case studies in ethnobotany. Brazilian Society of Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology / Publication Group of Ecology and Applied Ethnobotany, Recife.
  32. ———, T. Cardoso, A. B. Junqueira, N. P. S. Falcão, and C. R. Clement. 2009. Historical ecology and Dark Earths in whitewater and blackwater landscapes: Comparing the Middle Madeira and Lower Negro Rivers. Pages 229–264 in W. G. Woods, J. Lehmann, C. Steiner, and A. Winklerprins, eds., Terra Preta Nova: A tribute to Wim Sombroek. Springer, Berlin.
  33. Galeano, G. 2000. Forest use at the pacific coast of Chocó, Colombia: A quantitative approach. Economic Botany 54(3):358–376. · DOI
  34. Gatewood, J. B. 1984. Familiarity, vocabulary size, and recognition ability in four semantic domains. American Ethnologist 11:507–527. · DOI
  35. Gavin, M. C. 2004. Changes in forest use value through ecological succession and their implications for land management in the Peruvian Amazon. Conservation Biology 18(6):1562–1570. · DOI
  36. German, L. A. 2003a. Historical contingencies in the coevolution of environment and livelihood: Contributions to the debate on Amazonian Black Earth. Geoderma 111:307–331. · DOI
  37. ——— 2003b. Ethnoscientific understandings of Amazonian Dark Earths. Pages 179–201 in J. Lehmann, D. Kern, B. Glaser, and W. Woods, eds., Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. · DOI
  38. Heckenberger, M. J., A. Kuikuro, U. T. Kuikuro, J. C. Russel, M. Schmidt, C. Fausto, and B. Franchetto. 2003. Amazonia 1492: Pristine forest or cultural parkland? Science 301:1710–1714.
  39. Heckenberger, M. J., J. C. Russel, J. R. Toney, and M. J. Schmidt. 2007. The legacy of cultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon: Implications for biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences 362:197–208. · DOI
  40. Hiraoka, M., S. Yamamoto, E. Matsumoto, S. Nakamura, I. Falesi, and A. R. C. Baena. 2003. Contemporary use and management of Amazonian Dark Earths. Pages 387–406 in J. Lehmann, D. Kern, B. Glaser, and W. Woods, eds., Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  41. Junqueira, A. B., G. H. Shepard, and C. R. Clement. 2010. Secondary forests on anthropogenic soils conserve agrobiodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:1933–1961. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9813-1 . · DOI
  42. Kahn, F. and J. J. de Granville. 1992. Palms in forest ecosystems of Amazonia. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. · DOI
  43. Lucena, R. F. P., E. L. Araújo, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2007. Does the local availability of woody caatinga plants (northeastern Brazil) explain their use value? Economic Botany 61(4):347–361. · DOI
  44. McCann, J. M. 2003. Subsidy from culture: Anthropogenic soils and vegetation in Tapajônia, Brazilian Amazonia. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  45. McCune, B. and M. J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD for Windows: Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 425. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach.
  46. Moran, E. F. 1981. Developing the Amazon. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
  47. ——— 1993. Through Amazonian eyes: The human ecology of Amazonian populations. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City. · DOI
  48. Morcote-Ríos, G. and R. Bernal. 2001. Remains of palms (Palmae) at archaeological sites in the new world: A review. The Botanical Review 67:309–350. · DOI
  49. Murrieta, R., D. Dufour, and A. Siqueira. 1999. Food consumption and subsistence in three caboclo populations on Marajó Island, Amazonia, Brazil. Human Ecology 27(3):455–475. · DOI
  50. Neves, E. G., J. B. Petersen, R. N. Bartone, and C. A. Silva. 2003. Historical and socio-cultural origins of Amazonian Dark Earths. Pages 29–50 in J. Lehmann, D. Kern, B. Glaser, and W. Woods, eds., Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Phillips, O. and A. H. Gentry. 1993a. The useful plants of Tambopata. Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47(1):15–32.
  52. ——— and ———. 1993b. The useful plants of Tambopata. Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47(1):33–43. · DOI
  53. ———, ———, C. Reynel, P. Wilkin, and B. Gálvez-Durand. 1994. Quantitative ethnobotany and Amazonian conservation. Conservation Biology 8:225–248. · DOI
  54. Prance, G. T., W. Balée, and B. M. Boom. 1987. Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1(4):296–310. · DOI
  55. Rossato, S. C., H. F. Leitão-Filho, and A. Begossi. 1999. Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic forest coast (Brazil). Economic Botany 53(4):387–395. · DOI
  56. Smith, N. J. H. 1980. Anthrosols and human carrying capacity in Amazonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70:553–566. · DOI
  57. Tabuti, J. R. S., S. S. Dhillon, and K. A. Lye. 2003. Firewood use in Buolamogi County, Uganda: Species selection, harvesting and consumption patterns. Biomass and Bioenergy 25:581–596. · DOI
  58. Thomas, E., I. Vandebroek, and P. Van Damme. 2009. Valuation of forests and plant species in indigenous territory and national park Isiboro-Sécure, Bolivia. Economic Botany 63(3):229–241. · DOI
  59. Toledo, M. and J. Salick. 2006. Secondary succession and indigenous management in semideciduous forest fallows of the Amazon basin. Biotropica 38(2):161–170. · DOI
  60. Toledo, V. M., A. I. Batis, R. Becerra, E. Martinez, and C. H. Ramos. 1995. La selva útil: Etnobotánica cuantitativa de los grupos indígenas del trópico húmedo de México. Interciencia 20:177–187.
  61. Torre-Cuadros, M. D. L. A. and G. A. Islebe. 2003. Traditional ecological knowledge and use of vegetation in southeastern Mexico: A case study from Solferino, Quintana Roo. Biodiversity and Conservation 12(12):2455–2476. · DOI
  62. Voeks, R. A. 1996. Tropical forest healers and habitat preference. Economic Botany 50(4):381–400. · DOI
  63. Wadsworth, F. H. 1987. A time for secondary forests in tropical America. Pages 189–197 in J. C. Guiguera Colón, F. H. Wadsworth, and S. Branham, eds., Management of the forests of tropical America: Prospects and technologies. Institute of Tropical Forestry, U. S. Forest Service, Rio Piedras.
  64. Wilkinson, L. 2002. Systat software, v. 10.2. Systat software, Chicago.
  65. Woods, W. I. and J. M. McCann. 1999. The anthropogenic origin and persistence of Amazonian Dark Earths. The Yearbook of the Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 25:7–14.
  66. ——— and W. M. Denevan. 2009. Amazonian Dark Earths: The first century of reports. Pages 1–14 in W. Woods, W. G. Teixeira, J. Lehmann, C. Steiner, and A. Winklerprins, eds., Terra Preta Nova: A tribute to Wim Sombroek. Springer, Berlin.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 58

Metadata

Authors
Junqueira, A. B., Shepard, G. H., & Clement, C. R.
Venue
Economic Botany
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-11-11
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
85-99
ISSN
  • 0013-0001
  • 1874-9364
DOI
10.1007/s12231-010-9138-8
Cited by
58
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review