The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A detailed loads comparison of three building energy modeling programs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Aittomäki A, Kalema T (1976). TASE—A Computer Program for Energy Analysis of Buildings. Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Laboratory of Heating and Ventilating. (in Finnish)
- Andolsun A, Culp CH (2010). A comparison of EnergyPlus to DOE-2.1E: Multiple cases ranging from a sealed box to a residential building. In: Proceedings of SimBuild, New York, USA.
- ASHRAE (2007). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2007, Standard Method of Test for the Evaluation of Building Energy Analysis Computer Programs. Atlanta, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
- BLAST (1991). BLAST User Reference, Vols. 1, 2. Urbana, USA: University of Illinois.
- Booten C, Kruis N, Christensen C (2012). Identifying and Resolving Issues in EnergyPlus and DOE-2 Window Heat Transfer Calculations, NREL/TP-5500-55787. · DOI
- Crawley DB, Hand JW, Kurnment M, Griffith BT (2008). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 43: 661–673. · DOI
- Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmann FC, Buhl WF, Huang YJ, Pedersen CO, Strand RK, Liesen RJ, Fisher DE, Witte MJ, Glazer J (2001). EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33: 319–311. · DOI
- DeST (2006). Simulation Method for Building Thermal Environment-DeST. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2006. (in Chinese)
- DOE-2 (1980). DOE-2 Reference Manual Version 2.1, LBL-7689-M Ver.2.1, LBL-8706 Rev.1.
- DOE-2 (1982). DOE-2 Engineers Manual Version 2.1A, LBL-11353.
- EnergyGauge (2012). EnergyGauge User Manual 2010. Florida Solar Energy Center, USA.
- EnergyPlus (2011). Engineering Reference Version 7.0 Documentation. University of Illinois and Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA.
- EnergyPro (2011). EnergyPro User’s Manual, Version 5, July, 2011. EnergySoft, LLC, USA.
- eQuest (2009). eQuest Introductory Tutorial, Version 3.63, April, 2009. James J. Hirsch & Associates, USA.
- ESRU (1999). ESP-r: A building and plant energy simulation environment, User Guide Version 9 Series. ESRU Publication, University of Strathclyde, USA.
- Henninger RH, Witte MJ (2006). Test Report of LBNL DOE-2.1E119 Based on ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2004. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA.
- Huang J, Bourassa N, Buhl F, Erdem E, Hitchcock R (2006). Using EnergyPlus for California title-24 compliance calculations. In: Proceedings of SimBuild, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- IEA (1995). Building Energy Simulation Test (BESTEST) and Diagnostic Method. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA.
- Meldem R, Winkelmann F (1995). Comparison of DOE-2 with Measurements in the Pala Test House, LBL-37979. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA. · DOI
- Sullivan R (1998). Validation Studies of the DOE-2 Building Energy Simulation Program, LBNL-42241. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA. · DOI
- VisualDOE (2004). VisualDOE 4.0 User Manual, March, 2004. Architectural Energy Corporation, USA.
- Waddell C, Kaserekar S (2010). Solar gain and cooling load comparison using energy modeling software. In: Proceedings of SimBuild, New York, USA.
- Yan D, Xia J, Tang W, Song F, Zhang X, Jiang Y (2008). DeST—An integrated building simulation toolkit, Part I: Fundamentals. Building Simulation, 1: 95–110. · DOI
- Zhang X, Xia J, Jiang Z, Huang J, Qin R, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Jiang Y (2008). DeST—An integrated building simulation toolkit, Part II: Applications. Building Simulation, 1: 193–209. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings
Drgoňa, J., Arroyo, J., Cupeiro Figueroa, I., Blum, D., Arendt, K., Kim, D., Ollé, E. P., Oravec, J., Wetter, M., Vrabie, D. L., et al. (2020) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001 · Cited by 1,020
Prediction of Energy Consumption and Energy Savings in an Urban Vertical Farm Benchmark
Xie, S., Martinez‐Vazquez, P., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2026) · Energy Science & Engineering · doi:10.1002/ese3.70415
“…adaptable with climate data covering more than 1000 sites in more than 100 other countries/regions around the world, which slightly distinguishes it from DeST, another building energy modeling E+ and DeST show little result differences despite variations related to the heat balance algorithms [19].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, D., Hong, T., Yan, D., & Wang, C.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yan, Da
- Venue
- Building Simulation
- Published
- 2013-04-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-335
- ISSN
- 1996-3599 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-8744
- OpenAlex
- W2053367111
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 9.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Building Simulation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- building energy simulation, EnergyPlus, DeST, DOE-2.1E, steady-state heat transfer, building energy code compliance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
