Cited by 39Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFuel Cells and Related Materials

First-principles calculations of the dissolution and coalescence properties of Pt nanoparticle ORR catalysts: The effect of nanoparticle shape

Escaño, Mary Clare Sison·2015·Nano Research

Abstract

The degradation of Pt nanoparticles (NPs) in fuel cell cathodes leads to the loss of the precious metal catalyst. While the effect of NP size on Pt dissolution has been studied extensively, the influence of NP shape is largely unexplored. Because of the recent development of experimental methods to control the shape of metal NPs, rational guidelines/insights on the shape effects on NP stability are imperative. In this study, first-principles calculations based on density functional theory were conducted to determine the stability of 1–2 nm Pt NPs against Pt dissolution and coalescence with respect to NP shape. Toward dissolution, the stability of the Pt NPs increases in the following order: Hexagonal close-packed < icosahedral < cuboctahedral < truncated octahedral. This trend is attributed to the synergy of the oxygen adsorption strength and the local coordination of the Pt atoms. With respect to coalescence, the size of a NP is related to its propensity to coalesce or detach/migrate to form larger particles. The stability of the Pt NPs was found to increase in the following order: Hexagonal close-packed < truncated octahedral < cuboctahedral < icosahedral, and was correlated with the cohesive energies of the particles. By combining the characteristic stabilities of the shapes, new “metal-interfaced” Pt-based coreshell architectures were proposed that should be more stable than pure Pt nanoparticles with respect to both dissolution and coalescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12274-014-0670-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Escaño, M. C. S.
Affiliations
University of Fukui (JP)
Corresponding author
Escaño, Mary Clare Sison
Venue
Nano Research
Published
2015-02-11
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
1689-1697
ISSN
  • 1998-0000 (ISSN-L)
  • 1998-0124
OpenAlex
W2402123726
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nano Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
platinum nanoparticles, oxygen reduction reaction, catalyst deactivation, nanoparticle dissolution, nanoparticle coalescence, nanoparticle morphology, fuel cell cathode, oxygen adsorption, local coordination, cohesive energy, core-shell nanostructures, nanoparticle stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review