The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
M@MIL-100(Fe) (M = Au, Pd, Pt) nanocomposites fabricated by a facile photodeposition process: Efficient visible-light photocatalysts for redox reactions in water
Abstract
Proper design and preparation of high-performance and stable dual functional photocatalytic materials remains a significant objective of research. In this work, highly dispersed noble-metal nanoparticles (Au, Pd, Pt) were immobilized on MIL-100(Fe) (denoted M@MIL-100(Fe)) using a facile room-temperature photodeposition technique. The resulting M@MIL-100(Fe) (M = Au, Pd, and Pt) nanocomposites exhibited enhanced photoactivities toward photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO) and reduction of heavy-metal Cr(VI) ions under visible-light irradiation (λ ≥ 420 nm) compared with blank-MIL-100(Fe). Combining these results with photoelectrochemical analyses revealed that noble-metal deposition can effectively improve the charge-separation efficiency of MIL-100(Fe) under visible-light irradiation. This phenomenon in turn leads to the enhancement of visible-light-driven photoactivity of M@MIL-100(Fe) toward photocatalytic redox reactions. In particular, the Pt@MIL-100(Fe) with an average Pt particle size of 2 nm exhibited remarkably enhanced photoactivities compared with those of M@MIL-100(Fe) (M = Au and Pd), which can be attributed to the integrative effect of the enhanced light absorption intensity and more efficient separation of the photogenerated charge carrier. In addition, possible photocatalytic reaction mechanisms are also proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
Modified metal-organic frameworks as photocatalysts
Qiu, J., Zhang, X., Feng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, H., & Yao, J. (2018) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.039 · Cited by 499
Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Tang, L., Luo, L., & Zeng, G. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b02563 · Cited by 312
Zhang, J.-W., Lu, G.-P., & Cai, C. (2017) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c7gc02087b · Cited by 101
He, Z., Liang, R., Zhou, C., Yan, G., & Wu, L. (2021) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117725 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, R., Jing, F., Shen, L., Qin, N., & Wu, L.
- Venue
- Nano Research
- Publisher
- Tsinghua University Press
- Published
- 2015-08-14
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3237-3249
- ISSN
- 1998-0000 (ISSN-L)
- 1998-0124
- OpenAlex
- W2224299876
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: M@MIL-100(Fe) (M = Au, Pd, Pt) nanocomposites fabricated by a facile photodeposition process: Efficient visible-light photocatalysts for redox reactions in water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12274-015-0824-9
- The paper
- Liang, R., Jing, F., Shen, L., Qin, N., & Wu, L. (2015). M@MIL-100(Fe) (M = Au, Pd, Pt) nanocomposites fabricated by a facile photodeposition process: Efficient visible-light photocatalysts for redox reactions in water. Nano Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-015-0824-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
