Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of defects on photocatalytic activity of rutile TiO2 nanorods

Zhao, Zhao, Zhang, Xiaoyan, Zhang, Guoqiang, Liu, Zhenyu, Qu, Dan, Miao, Xiang, Feng, Pingyun, Sun, Zaicheng·2015·Nano Research

Abstract

To further understand the effect of structural defects on the electrochemical and photocatalytic properties of TiO 2 , two synthetic approaches based on hydrothermal synthesis and post-synthetic chemical reduction to achieve oxygen defectimplantation were developed herein. These approaches led to the formation of TiO 2 nanorods with uniformly distributed defects in either the bulk or on the surface, or the combination of both, in the formed TiO 2 nanorods (NRs). Both approaches utilize unique TiN nanoparticles as the reaction precursor. Electron microscopy and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analyses indicate that all the studied samples exhibit similar morphology and similar specific surface areas. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) data confirm the existence of oxygen defects (VO). The photocatalytic properties of TiO 2 with different types of implanted VO were evaluated based on photocatalytic H 2 production. By optimizing the concentration of VO among the TiO 2 NRs subjected to different treatments, significantly higher photocatalytic activities than that of the stoichiometric TiO 2 NRs was achieved. The incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) data indicate that the enhanced photocatalytic activity arises mainly from defect-assisted charge separation, which implies that photo-generated electrons or holes can be captured by VO and suppress the charge recombination process. The results show that the defective TiO 2 obtained by combining the two approaches exhibits the greatest photocatalytic activity enhancement among all the samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12274-015-0917-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, G., Liu, Z., Qu, D., Miao, X., Feng, P., & Sun, Z.
Venue
Nano Research
Published
2015-11-18
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
4061-4071
ISSN
  • 1998-0000 (ISSN-L)
  • 1998-0124
OpenAlex
W2179172700
Cited by
185
References
2
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of defects on photocatalytic activity of rutile TiO2 nanorods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12274-015-0917-5
The paper
Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, G., Liu, Z., Qu, D., Miao, X., Feng, P., & Sun, Z. (2015). Effect of defects on photocatalytic activity of rutile TiO2 nanorods. Nano Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-015-0917-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.