Cited by 58Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

Kinetic study of electrochemically produced hydrogen bubbles on Pt electrodes with tailored geometries

Qin, Jingshan, Xie, Tianhui, Zhou, Daojin, Luo, Liang, Zhang, Zhengyi, Shang, Zhicheng, Li, Jiawei, Mohapatra, Lagnamayee +3 more·2021·Nano Research

Abstract

Understanding bubbles evolution kinetics on electrodes with varied geometries is of fundamental importance for advanced electrodes design in gas evolution reaction. In this work, the evolution kinetics of electro-generated hydrogen bubbles are recorded in situ on three (i.e. smooth, nanoporous, and nanoarray) Pt electrodes to identify the geometry dependence. The bubble radius shows a time-dependent growth kinetic, which is tightly-connected to the electrode geometry. Among the three electrodes, the smooth one shows a typical time coefficient of 0.5, in consistence with reported values; the nanoporous one shows a time coefficient of 0.47, less than the classic one (0.5); while the nanoarray one exhibits fastest bubble growth kinetics with a time coefficient higher than 0.5 (0.54). Moreover, the nanoarray electrode has the smallest bubble detachment size and the largest growth coefficient (23.3) of all three electrodes. Based on the experimental results, a growth model combined direct bottom- injection with micro-convection is proposed to illustrate the surface geometry dependent coefficients, i.e., the relationship between geometry and bubble evolution kinetics. The direct injection of generated gas molecules from the bottom of bubbles at the three phase boundaries are believed the key to tailor the bubble wetting states and thus determine the bubble evolution kinetics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12274-020-3132-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 58

Authors
Qin, J., Xie, T., Zhou, D., Luo, L., Zhang, Z., Shang, Z., Li, J., Mohapatra, L., Yu, J., Xu, H., & Sun, X.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Luo, Liang
  • Xu, Haijun
  • Sun, Xiaoming
Venue
Nano Research
Published
2021-01-11
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
2154-2159
ISSN
  • 1998-0000 (ISSN-L)
  • 1998-0124
OpenAlex
W3118619542
Cited by
58
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nano Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Keywords
platinum electrode, electrode geometry, nanoporous electrodes, bubble detachment, gas evolution reactions, microconvection, bubble growth model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review