In vivo studies with a Candida tropicalis isolate exhibiting paradoxical growth in vitro in the presence of high concentration of caspofungin
Abstract
We investigated the activity of caspofungin against a Candida tropicalis clinical isolate showing paradoxical growth in vitro. BALB/c mice immunosuppressed by cyclophosphamide were infected intraperitoneally using 10(7) CFU/mouse. Caspofungin was administered intraperitoneally once daily for 5 days or as a single dose using the following doses: 0.12, 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 15 mg/kg. The single dose of caspofungin was effective only at 5 and 15 mg/kg concentrations (100% survival). Five-day caspofungin treatment led to 100% survival at doses of 1 mg/kg or higher. Caspofungin treatment significantly decreased the number of viable yeasts in the peritoneal lavage samples as well as in the infected abscesses at doses 1, 3, 5, and 15 mg/kg caspofungin as compared to the untreated control (P<0.001 in all cases), and even to the group treated with 0.12 mg/kg caspofungin (P<0.05 in all cases). At 2 mg/kg caspofungin dose, sterilization of the internal organs was reproducibly incomplete, suggesting that the role of paradoxical growth in the late clinical failure cannot be excluded.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An animal model of peritoneal C. tropicalis infection using a strain showing paradoxical growth demonstrated impaired fungal clearance with high caspofungin concentrations.
“However, an animal model of peritoneal C. tropicalis infection using a strain showing paradoxical growth demonstrated impaired fungal clearance with high caspofungin concentrations [40], suggesting that this phenomenon may contribute to persistence and relapsed infection in vivo.”
From Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis: A Narrative Review (2018) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Bayegan, S., Majoros, L., Kardos, G., Kemény-Beke, A., Miszti, C., Kovacs, R., & Gesztelyi, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Debrecen (HU)
- ORCID
- Gesztelyi, Rudolf
- Venue
- The Journal of Microbiology
- Publisher
- The Microbiological Society of Korea
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 170-173
- ISSN
- 1225-8873 (ISSN-L)
- 1976-3794
- OpenAlex
- W2116255804
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- caspofungin, Candida tropicalis, antifungal resistance, candidiasis, immunosuppressed mice, cyclophosphamide, peritoneal infection, antifungal susceptibility, treatment failure
- MeSH terms
- Caspofungin, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Ascitic Fluid, Candidiasis, Female, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Colony Count, Microbial, Survival Analysis, Immunocompromised Host, Candida tropicalis, Microbial Viability, Mice, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review