Cited by 21Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal and yeast genetics research

In vivo studies with a Candida tropicalis isolate exhibiting paradoxical growth in vitro in the presence of high concentration of caspofungin

Bayegan, Sedigh, Majoros, Laszlo, Kardos, Gabor, Kemény-Beke, Adam, Miszti, Cecilia, Kovacs, Renato, Gesztelyi, Rudolf·2010·The Journal of Microbiology

Abstract

We investigated the activity of caspofungin against a Candida tropicalis clinical isolate showing paradoxical growth in vitro. BALB/c mice immunosuppressed by cyclophosphamide were infected intraperitoneally using 10(7) CFU/mouse. Caspofungin was administered intraperitoneally once daily for 5 days or as a single dose using the following doses: 0.12, 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 15 mg/kg. The single dose of caspofungin was effective only at 5 and 15 mg/kg concentrations (100% survival). Five-day caspofungin treatment led to 100% survival at doses of 1 mg/kg or higher. Caspofungin treatment significantly decreased the number of viable yeasts in the peritoneal lavage samples as well as in the infected abscesses at doses 1, 3, 5, and 15 mg/kg caspofungin as compared to the untreated control (P<0.001 in all cases), and even to the group treated with 0.12 mg/kg caspofungin (P<0.05 in all cases). At 2 mg/kg caspofungin dose, sterilization of the internal organs was reproducibly incomplete, suggesting that the role of paradoxical growth in the late clinical failure cannot be excluded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12275-010-9221-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An animal model of peritoneal C. tropicalis infection using a strain showing paradoxical growth demonstrated impaired fungal clearance with high caspofungin concentrations.

    “However, an animal model of peritoneal C. tropicalis infection using a strain showing paradoxical growth demonstrated impaired fungal clearance with high caspofungin concentrations [40], suggesting that this phenomenon may contribute to persistence and relapsed infection in vivo.”

    From Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis: A Narrative Review (2018) · cites this paper as [40]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 21

Authors
Bayegan, S., Majoros, L., Kardos, G., Kemény-Beke, A., Miszti, C., Kovacs, R., & Gesztelyi, R.
Affiliations
University of Debrecen (HU)
Venue
The Journal of Microbiology
Published
2010-04
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
170-173
ISSN
  • 1225-8873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1976-3794
OpenAlex
W2116255804
Cited by
21
References
13
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
caspofungin, Candida tropicalis, antifungal resistance, candidiasis, immunosuppressed mice, cyclophosphamide, peritoneal infection, antifungal susceptibility, treatment failure
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Ascitic Fluid, Candidiasis, Female, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Colony Count, Microbial, Survival Analysis, Immunocompromised Host, Candida tropicalis, Microbial Viability, Mice, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review