Cited by 34Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsReliability and Agreement in Measurement

TSH Comparison Between Chemiluminescence (Architect) and Electrochemiluminescence (Cobas) Immunoassays: An Indian Population Perspective

Open access
Sarkar, Rajarshi·2014·Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry

Abstract

Although 3rd generation TSH assays are the most widely used immunoassays, credible comparison studies, specially involving Indian sub-populations are practically non-existent. To compare the TSH measurements between chemiluminescence (Architect) and electrochemiluminescence (Cobas) inmmunoassays in an urban ambulatory Indian population. 1,615 subjects were selected randomly from the usual laboratory workflow, their TSH measured in Architect and Cobas and the paired data thus generated were statistically analysed. TSH values of Cobas were observed to be higher than the Architect values by 28.7 %, with a significant proportional difference between the two, but majority of the Cobas values (above 90 %) were within the limits of agreement with Architect values. In situations where both the instruments are in use simultaneously, a standardization of the methods is imperative, in larger interest of the patient populace.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12291-013-0339-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • State-of-the-art APS can be derived from evaluation and comparison of laboratory methods or from peer comparison data from proficiency testing programs.

    “Alternatively, the state-of-the-art APS can be derived from the evaluation and comparison of laboratory methods99–104 or using peer comparison data from proficiency testing programs.105–107”

    From Thyroid Stimulating Hormone and Thyroid Hormones (Triiodothyronine and Thyroxine): An American Thyroid Association-Commissioned Review of Current Clinical and Laboratory Status (2023) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies this as a study of the comparability of two laboratory methods, so it supports the method-comparison part of the citing sentence. Neither that passage nor the Discussion passages say that state-of-the-art analytical performance specifications can be derived from such comparisons. The proficiency-testing clause has separate citations and is not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 34

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Pierce JG. The subunits of pituitary thyrotropin. Their relation- ship with other glycoprotein hormones. Endocrinology. 1971;89: 1331-44.
  2. C ¸ımrın D, S ¸is ¸man AR, Kenesarı Y, Ku ¨me T, Akan P, Cocer C. Comparison of Siemens Immulite and Abbott Architect TSH measurement methods. Turk Klinik Biyokimya Dergisi. 2011;9(3):97-103.
  3. Passing H, Bablok W, Bender R, Schneider B. A general regression procedure for method transformation. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1988;26(11):783-90.
  4. Hendriks HA, Kortlandt W, Verweij WM. Analytical perfor- mance comparison of five new generation immunoassay analyz- ers. Ned Tijdschr Klin Chem. 2000;25:170-7.
  5. Bjerner J, Nustad K, Norum LF, Olsen KH, Børmer OP. Immu- nometric assay interferences: incidence and prevention. Clin Chem. 2002;48:613.
  6. Valdes R Jr, Miller TI. Increasing the specificity of immunoas- says. J Clin Immunoassay. 1992;15:87.

Authors
Sarkar, R.
Corresponding author
Sarkar, Rajarshi
Venue
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
Published
2013-05-26
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
189-195
ISSN
  • 0970-1915 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-0422
OpenAlex
W2092463391
Cited by
34
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
thyroid-stimulating hormone, TSH immunoassay, chemiluminescence immunoassay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, architects, Coba, assay comparison, method standardization, Indian population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review