Cited by 131Behavioral and Psychological StudiesSchool Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

A supportive beliefs intervention to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices within a multi-tiered system of supports

Cook, Clayton R., Lyon, Aaron R., Kubergovic, Dajana, Browning Wright, Diana, Zhang, Yanchen·2015·School Mental Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12310-014-9139-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 131

Authors
Cook, C. R., Lyon, A. R., Kubergovic, D., Browning Wright, D., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Clayton R.
Venue
School Mental Health
Published
2015-01-21
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
49-60
ISSN
  • 1866-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-2633
OpenAlex
W1986458097
Cited by
131
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
20.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
multi-tiered systems of support, evidence-based practice, implementation fidelity, teacher beliefs, school coaches, Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, school-wide implementation, elementary school, collaborative consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review