Mental health training programs for secondary school teachers: a systematic review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anderson and colleagues found positive changes in attitudes (d=0.36-1.18) after intervention and at follow-up (0.68-1.0) in eight studies of information about signs and symptoms of common adolescent mental health conditions.
“They found positive changes in attitudes (effect size d=0•36-1•18) after intervention and at follow-up (0•68-1•0).”
From The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health (2022) · cites this paper as [132]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Anderson, M., Werner-Seidler, A., King, C., Gayed, A., Harvey, S. B., & O’Dea, B.
- Affiliations
- Black Dog Institute (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, Melissa
- Venue
- School Mental Health
- Published
- 2018-10-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 489-508
- ISSN
- 1866-2625 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-2633
- OpenAlex
- W2895062997
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- School Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- This research was supported by a grant from the Black Dog Institute Kickstart Seed Funding
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- secondary school teachers, adolescent depression, adolescent anxiety, teacher knowledge, teacher attitudes, helping behavior, student mental health, teacher well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
