Cited by 46Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationNeurological disorders and treatments

Metabolic changes of cerebrum by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over lateral cerebellum: a study with FDG PET

Cho, Sang Soo, Yoon, Eun Jin, Bang, Sung Ae, Park, Hyun Soo, Kim, Yu Kyeong, Strafella, Antonio P., Kim, Sang Eun·2012·The Cerebellum

Abstract

To better understand the functional role of cerebellum within the large-scale cerebellocerebral neural network, we investigated the changes of neuronal activity elicited by cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and positron emission tomography (PET). Twelve right-handed healthy volunteers were studied with brain FDG PET under two conditions: active rTMS of 1 Hz frequency over the left lateral cerebellum and sham stimulation. Compared to the sham condition, active rTMS induced decreased glucose metabolism in the stimulated left lateral cerebellum, the areas known to be involved in voluntary motor movement (supplementary motor area and posterior parietal cortex) in the right cerebral hemisphere, and the areas known to be involved in cognition and emotion (orbitofrontal, medial frontal, and anterior cingulate gyri) in the left cerebral hemisphere. Increased metabolism was found in cognition- and language-related brain regions such as the left inferior frontal gyrus including Broca's area, bilateral superior temporal gyri including Wernicke's area, and bilateral middle temporal gyri. Left cerebellar rTMS also led to increased metabolism in the left cerebellar dentate nucleus and pons. These results demonstrate that rTMS over the left lateral cerebellum modulates not only the target region excitability but also excitability of remote, but interconnected, motor-, language-, cognition-, and emotion-related cerebral region…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12311-011-0333-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 79 · Cited by 46

Authors
Cho, S. S., Yoon, E. J., Bang, S. A., Park, H. S., Kim, Y. K., Strafella, A. P., & Kim, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Kim, Sang Eun
Venue
The Cerebellum
Published
2011-12-13
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
739-748
ISSN
  • 1473-4222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4230
OpenAlex
W1979804242
Cited by
46
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Cerebellum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, lateral cerebellum, cerebellar dentate nucleus, passive optical networks, Broca's area, Wernicke's area, supplementary motor area, posterior parietal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, language processing, cognitive function, emotions
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Chemistry, Cerebellum, Cognition, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electromyography, Female, Glucose, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review