The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Efficacy and Safety of Transitioning to Lemborexant from Z-drug, Suvorexant, and Ramelteon in Japanese Insomnia Patients: An Open-label, Multicenter Study
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: For patients with chronic insomnia, conventional therapy may not always provide satisfactory efficacy and safety. Thus, switching to an alternative therapeutic agent can be explored. However, there is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness of such changes. This prospective, non-randomized, open-label, interventional, multicenter study assessed whether Japanese patients with chronic insomnia dissatisfied with treatment could transition directly to lemborexant (LEM) from four cohorts-non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic (zolpidem, zopiclone, or eszopiclone) monotherapy, dual orexin receptor antagonist (suvorexant) monotherapy, suvorexant + benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs), and melatonin receptor agonist (ramelteon) combination. We evaluated whether transitioning to LEM improved patient satisfaction based on efficacy and safety. METHODS: The primary endpoint was the proportion of successful transitions to LEM at 2 weeks (titration phase end), defined as the proportion of patients on LEM by the end of the 2-week titration phase who were willing to continue on LEM during the maintenance phase (Weeks 2-14). Patient satisfaction and safety (the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) were assessed at 14 weeks (end of titration and maintenance phases). RESULTS: Among the 90 patients enrolled, 95.6% (95% confidence interval: 89.0-98.8%) successfully transitioned to LEM at 2 weeks. The proportions of patients who successfully continued on LEM were 97.8% and 82.2% at the end of the titration and maintenance phases (Weeks 2 and 14), respectively. The overall incidence of TEAEs was 47.8%; no serious TEAEs occurred. In all cohorts, the proportions of patients with positive responses were higher than the proportions with negative responses on the three scales of the Patient Global Impression-Insomnia version. During the maintenance phase, Insomnia Severity Index scores generally improved at Weeks 2, 6, and 14 of LEM transition. CONCLUSIONS: Direct transition to LEM may be a valid treatment option for patients with insomnia who are dissatisfied with current treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04742699.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Around 95% of the patients successfully transitioned to lemborexant within 14 days.”
From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [82]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Lemborexant was associated with greater efficacy than suvorexant and ramelteon, showing fewer adverse events and greater improvements in insomnia symptoms.”
From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [82]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Direct switching to lemborexant seems to be a viable and potentially-beneficial strategy to facilitate BZD/Z-drug discontinuation in patients with insomnia disorder. 82”
From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Ozone, M., Hirota, S., Ariyoshi, Y., Hayashida, K., Ikegami, A., Habukawa, M., Ohshima, H., Harada, D., Hiejima, H., Kotorii, N., Murotani, K., Taninaga, T., & Uchimura, N.
- Affiliations
- Kurume University (JP)
- Eisai (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ozone, Motohiro
- ORCID
- Venue
- Advances in Therapy
- Published
- 2024-03-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1728-1745
- ISSN
- 0741-238X (ISSN-L)
- 1865-8652
- PMC
- PMC10960898
- OpenAlex
- W4392614952
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Advances in Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eisai Co., Ltd.
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- lemborexant, chronic insomnia, treatment switching, suvorexant, ramelteon, orexin receptor antagonists, melatonin receptor agonists, benzodiazepine receptor agonists, treatment satisfaction, treatment-emergent adverse events, Insomnia Severity Index, Japanese patients
- MeSH terms
- Azepines, Humans, Indenes, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Japan, Prospective Studies, Pyridines, Pyrimidines, Triazoles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review