Cited by 5Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The Composite Number Needed to Treat for Semaglutide in Populations with Overweight or Obesity and Established Cardiovascular Disease Without Diabetes

Open access
Lübker, Christopher, Bhavsar, Jigish, Duque do Vale, Ruben, Emerson, Scott S., Nørtoft, Emil, Plutzky, Jorge, Roberts, Geraint, Tarp, Jens Magelund +1 more·2025·Advances in Therapy

Abstract

Number needed to treat (NNT), an outcome measure derived from the estimated risk results of clinical trials, is widely used to demonstrate value to stakeholders by identifying how many patients require treatment to avoid one event of interest. However, NNTs calculated for primary trial endpoints may underestimate a treatment’s value by not considering other outcomes. In this secondary analysis of data from the SELECT cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial, we aimed to determine the NNT for semaglutide for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), in addition to NNTs when other clinically and payer-relevant outcomes are included. This study is a secondary analysis of data from the randomized, double-blind SELECT trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574597) of once-weekly subcutaneous administration of semaglutide compared with placebo in 17,604 patients with overweight or obesity and with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) (39.8 months mean follow-up). The outcomes were NNT 3P-MACE (based upon the trial’s composite primary endpoint of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke), NNT EXTENDED (inclusive of NNT 3P-MACE , hospitalization for any cause, coronary revascularization, and non-CV death), and NNT CKM (inclusive of NNT EXTENDED , glycated hemoglobin level [HbA 1c ] ≥ 6.5%, and a 5-point nephropathy composite). The relative risk reductions observed for the events comprising the NNTs were 20% (NNT 3P-MACE ), 20% (NNT EXTENDED ), and 41% (NNT CKM ). At 1 and 4 years post initiation of semaglutide, NNT 3P-MACE was 125 and 58, NNT EXTENDED was 49 and 25, and NNT CKM was 20 and 11, respectively. When clinically and payer-relevant outcomes from the SELECT trial are included in calculations of NNT, semaglutide was associated with greater risk reductions and lower estimates of NNT than for the primary endpoint alone. Our findings suggest that including the broader effects of semaglutide beyond the primary trial endpoint recognizes additional value to stakeholders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12325-025-03176-w

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the SELECT trial, GLP1-RAs were highly effective with sustained intervention, with a number needed to treat to prevent one cardiovascular event of 67 patients following a mean duration of treatment of 34.2 ± 13.7 months.

    “In the SELECT trial, GLP1-RAs were highly effective with sustained intervention, with a number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one cardiovascular event of 67 patients following a mean duration of treatment of 34.2 ± 13.7 months.”

    From The societal implications of using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Results table reports an NNT of 67 for SELECT’s primary cardiovascular composite endpoint with semaglutide, at 39.8 months’ mean follow-up. The cited paper does not report the claimed 34.2 ± 13.7 months of treatment, and its result concerns semaglutide rather than GLP-1 receptor agonists as a class. The indexed passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [3]Ng M, Dai X, Cogen RM, et al. National-level and state-level prevalence of overweight and obesity among children, adolescents, and adults in the USA, 1990–2021, and forecasts up to 2050. Lancet. 2024;404(10469):2278–98. 39551059 PMC11694015 · DOI
  2. [4]Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(21):e984–1010. 33882682 PMC8493650 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13–27. 28604169 PMC5477817 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [6]Chandrasekaran P, Weiskirchen R. The role of obesity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(3):1882. 38339160 PMC10855901 · DOI
  5. [8]Kovesdy CP, Furth S, Zoccali C. Obesity and kidney disease: hidden consequences of the epidemic. Indian J Nephrol. 2017;27(2):85–92. 28356657 PMC5358165 · DOI
  6. [9]Ye C, Kong L, Zhao Z, et al. Causal associations of obesity with chronic kidney disease and arterial stiffness: a Mendelian randomization study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(2):e825–35. 34448477 · DOI
  7. [10]Jadoul M, Aoun M, Masimango IM. The major global burden of chronic kidney disease. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(3):e342–3. 38365398 · DOI
  8. [11]Bello AK, Okpechi IG, Levin A, et al. An update on the global disparities in kidney disease burden and care across world countries and regions. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(3):e382–95. 38365413 · DOI
  9. [12]Rangaswami J, Bhalla V, Blair JEA, et al. Cardiorenal syndrome: classification, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment strategies: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(16):e840–78. 30852913 · DOI
  10. [14]Busetto L, Dicker D, Frühbeck G, et al. A new framework for the diagnosis, staging and management of obesity in adults. Nat Med. 2024;30(9):2395–9. 38969880 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [15]Wing RR, Lang W, Wadden TA, et al. Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1481–6. 21593294 PMC3120182 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [16]Van Gaal LF, Mertens IL, Ballaux D. What is the relationship between risk factor reduction and degree of weight loss? Eur Heart J Suppl. 2005;7(suppl_L):L21–6. · DOI
  13. [17]Neeland IJ, McGuire DK, Sattar N. Cardiovascular outcomes trials for weight loss interventions: another tool for cardiovascular prevention? Circulation. 2021;144(17):1359–61. 34694889 · DOI
  14. [20]Ussher JR, Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: cardiovascular benefits and mechanisms of action. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(7):463–74. 36977782 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [23]Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415–537. 39210710 · DOI
  16. [24]Ludwig L, Darmon P, Guerci B. Computing and interpreting the number needed to treat for cardiovascular outcomes trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):65. 32404155 PMC7222529 · DOI
  17. [25]Mendes D, Alves C, Batel-Marques F. Number needed to treat (NNT) in clinical literature: an appraisal. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):112. 28571585 PMC5455127 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [26]Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(26):1728–33. 3374545 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [27]Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ. 1995;310(6977):452–4. 7873954 PMC2548824 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [28]Gouskova NA, Kundu S, Imrey PB, Fine JP. Number needed to treat for time-to-event data with competing risks. Stat Med. 2014;33(2):181–92. 24038032 · DOI
  21. [29]McAlister FA. The “number needed to treat” turns 20–and continues to be used and misused. CMAJ. 2008;179(6):549–53. 18779528 PMC2527399 · DOI
  22. [30]Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(8):663–94. 11304107 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [31]Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869. 20332511 PMC2844943 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [35]Lingvay I, Deanfield J, Kahn SE, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes by baseline HbA1c and change in HbA1c in people with overweight or obesity but without diabetes in SELECT. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(8):1360–9. 38907684 PMC11282385 · DOI
  25. [36]Ryan DH, Lingvay I, Deanfield J, et al. Long-term weight loss effects of semaglutide in obesity without diabetes in the SELECT trial. Nat Med. 2024;30(7):2049–57. 38740993 PMC11271387 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [38]Verma S, Colhoun HM, Dicker D, et al. Semaglutide effects on cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight or obesity (SELECT): outcomes by sex. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84(17):1678–82. 39217575 · DOI
  27. [39]Altman DG, Andersen PK. Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event. BMJ. 1999;319(7223):1492–5. 10582940 PMC1117211 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [40]Le R, Nguyen MT, Allahwala MA, et al. Cardiovascular protective properties of GLP-1 receptor agonists: more than just diabetic and weight loss drugs. J Clin Med. 2024;13(16):4674. 39200816 PMC11355214 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [41]Davies MJ, Kloecker DE, Webb DR, Khunti K, Zaccardi F. Number needed to treat in cardiovascular outcome trials of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: aA systematic review with temporal analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(9):1670–7. 32372425 · DOI
  30. [43]Kristiansen IS, Gyrd-Hansen D. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the number-needed-to-treat: common sense or non-sense? Health Econ. 2004;13(1):9–19. 14724890 · DOI
  31. [44]Kumar S, Blaha MJ. GLP-1 RA for cardiometabolic risk reduction in obesity: how do we best describe benefit and value? Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024;18:100682. 38840935 PMC11152602 · DOI
  32. [45]Roose SP, Rutherford BR, Wall MM, Thase ME. Practising evidence-based medicine in an era of high placebo response: number needed to treat reconsidered. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208(5):416–20. 27143006 PMC4853640 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lübker, C., Bhavsar, J., Duque do Vale, R., Emerson, S. S., Nørtoft, E., Plutzky, J., Roberts, G., Tarp, J. M., & Lincoff, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Lübker, Christopher
Venue
Advances in Therapy
Published
2025-03-29
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
2513-2525
ISSN
  • 0741-238X (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-8652
OpenAlex
W4409039208
Cited by
5
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
semaglutide, number needed to treat, major adverse cardiovascular events, obesity, overweight, established cardiovascular disease, SELECT trial, HbA1c, diabetic nephropathy, hospitalization, coronary revascularization, GLP-1 receptor agonists, treatment value
MeSH terms
Secondary Data Analysis, Semaglutide, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Double-Blind Method, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Overweight, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Numbers Needed To Treat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review