Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2—evidence base and standardized methods of imaging

Open access
Dorbala, Sharmila, Ando, Yukio, Bokhari, Sabahat, Dispenzieri, Angela, Falk, Rodney H., Ferrari, Victor A., Fontana, Marianna, Gheysens, Olivier, Gillmore, Julian D., Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M., Hanna, Mazen A., Hazenberg, Bouke P.C., Kristen, Arnt V., Kwong, Raymond Y., Maurer, Mathew S., Merlini, Giampaolo, Miller, Edward J., Moon, James C., Murthy, Venkatesh L., Quarta, C. Cristina, Rapezzi, Claudio, Ruberg, Frederick L., Shah, Sanjiv J., Slart, Riemer H.J.A., Verberne, Hein J., Bourque, Jamieson M.·2019·Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Abstract

Cardiac amyloidosis is a form of restrictive infiltrative cardiomyopathy that confers significant mortality.Due to the relative rarity of cardiac amyloidosis, clinical and diagnostic expertise in the recognition and evaluation of individuals with suspected amyloidosis is mostly limited to a few expert centers.Electrocardiography, echocardiography, and radionuclide imaging have been used for the evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis for over 40 years.[1][2][3] Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has also been in clinical practice for several decades, it was not applied to cardiac amyloidosis until the late 1990s.Despite an abundance of diagnostic imaging options, cardiac amyloidosis remains largely underrecognized or delayed in diagnosis.4 While advanced imaging options for noninvasive evaluation have substantially expanded, the evidence is predominately confined to single-center small studies or limited multicenter larger experiences, and there continues to be no clear consensus on standardized imaging pathways in cardiac amyloidosis.This lack of guidance is particularly problematic given that there are numerous emerging therapeutic options for this morbid disease, increasing the importance of accurate recognition at earlier stages.Imaging provides non-invasive tools for follow-up of disease remission/ progression complementing clinical evaluation.Additional areas not defined include appropriate clinical indications for imaging, optimal imaging utilization by clinical presentation, accepted imaging methods, accurate image interpretation, and comprehensive and clear reporting.Prospective randomized clinical trial data for the diagnosis of amyloidosis and for imaging-based strategies for treatment are not available.A consensus of expert opinion is greatly needed to guide the appropriate clinical utilization of imaging in cardiac amyloidosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12350-019-01760-6

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 153 references

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Dorbala, S., Ando, Y., Bokhari, S., Dispenzieri, A., Falk, R. H., Ferrari, V. A., Fontana, M., Gheysens, O., Gillmore, J. D., Glaudemans, A. W. J. M., Hanna, M. A., Hazenberg, B. P. C., Kristen, A. V., Kwong, R. Y., Maurer, M. S., Merlini, G., Miller, E. J., Moon, J. C., Murthy, V. L., Quarta, C. C., Rapezzi, C., Ruberg, F. L., Shah, S. J., Slart, R. H. J. A., Verberne, H. J., & Bourque, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
2065-2123
ISSN
1071-3581 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970218258
Cited by
484
References
153
FWCI
15.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2—evidence base and standardized methods of imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12350-019-01760-6
The paper
Dorbala, S., Ando, Y., Bokhari, S., Dispenzieri, A., Falk, R. H., Ferrari, V. A., Fontana, M., Gheysens, O., Gillmore, J. D., Glaudemans, A. W. J. M., Hanna, M. A., Hazenberg, B. P. C., Kristen, A. V., Kwong, R. Y., Maurer, M. S., Merlini, G., Miller, E. J., Moon, J. C., Murthy, V. L., . . . Bourque, J. M. (2019). ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2—evidence base and standardized methods of imaging. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01760-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.