Robots in Society, Society in Robots: Mutual Shaping of Society and Technology as a Framework for Social Robot Design
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Robots may be accepted as informed community members, granting them an outsized potential for persuasion and influence.
“robots may be accepted as informed community members (although cp. [7]), granting them an outsized potential for persuasion and influence [26, 50, 53].”
From Robots for Social Justice (R4SJ): Toward a More Equitable Practice of Human-Robot Interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 314
- Authors
- Šabanović, S.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Šabanović, Selma
- ORCID
- Šabanović, Selma
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Robotics
- Published
- 2010-10-22
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 439-450
- ISSN
- 1875-4791 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-4805
- OpenAlex
- W1908150177
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Social Robotics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- social robots, technology acceptance, co-production, participatory design, stakeholder engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
