Cited by 18Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Is the treatment with psychostimulants in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder harmful for the dopaminergic system?

Gerlach, Manfred, Grünblatt, Edna, Lange, Klaus W.·2013·ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders

Abstract

A major concern regarding psychostimulant medication (amphetamine and methylphenidate) in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are the potential adverse effects to the developing brain, particularly in regard to dopaminergic brain function. The present review focuses on the pharmacology of these psychostimulants, their mode of action in the human brain and their potential neurotoxic effects to the developing brain in animals, particularly concerning DA brain function. The potential clinical significance of these findings for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents is discussed. Studies on sensitization to psychostimulants' rewarding effects, which is a process expected to increase the risk of substance abuse in humans, are not included. The available findings in non-human primates support the notion that the administration of amphetamine and methylphenidate with procedures simulating clinical treatment conditions does not lead to long-term adverse effects in regard to development, neurobiology or behaviour as related to the central dopaminergic system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12402-013-0105-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neurobiological mechanism of currently available pharmacological treatments is thought to rely on restoring dopamine to physiological levels.

    “This is also consistent with the currently available pharmacological treatments, whose neurobiological mechanism is thought to rely on restoring dopamine to physiological levels (Abi-Dargham and Laruelle, 2005; Gerlach et al., 2013).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 18

Authors
Gerlach, M., Grünblatt, E., & Lange, K. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Gerlach, Manfred
Venue
ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders
Published
2013-04-21
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
71-81
ISSN
  • 1866-6116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-6647
OpenAlex
W2009738833
Cited by
18
References
55
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, psychostimulants, amphetamine, methylphenidate, dopaminergic system, neurotoxicity, developing brain, children and adolescents, non-human primates, late effects, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Humans, Methylphenidate, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review