A critical review of mechanisms involved in the adsorption of organic and inorganic contaminants through biochar
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 292 · Cited by 236
- Authors
- Abbas, Z., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Zaheer, I. E., Malik, A., Riaz, M. A., Shahid, M. R., Rehman, M. Z. U., & Al-Wabel, M. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (PK)
- Government College University, Faisalabad (PK)
- Government College University, Lahore (PK)
- University of Agriculture Faisalabad (PK)
- King Saud University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Ali, Shafaqat
- Venue
- Arabian Journal of Geosciences
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 1866-7511 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-7538
- OpenAlex
- W2887689413
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 292
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Arabian Journal of Geosciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Higher Education Commission, Pakistan
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Keywords
- biochar, adsorption mechanism, organic pollutants, inorganic contaminants, pyrolysis temperature, electrostatic interactions, ion exchange, precipitation chemistry, pore filling, hydrophobic interactions, soil remediation, water remediation, biochar activation, biochar modification, solution pH, coexisting ions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review