Cited by 5Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Effect of pre-training on cognitive load and achievement in a computer-based learning environment

Akbulut, Yavuz, Dönmez, Onur, Ceylan, Beril, Firat, Tayfun·2025·Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12528-024-09420-6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pre-training may not always be redundant for higher prior knowledge learners, contradicting some previous assumptions.

    “This suggests that pre-training may not always be redundant for these learners, which contradicts some of the previous assumptions (Akbulut et al., 2024; Kalyuga, 2007a, 2007b; Mayer and Pilegard, 2014; Trypke et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akbulut, Y., Dönmez, O., Ceylan, B., & Firat, T.
Affiliations
Ege University (TR)
Corresponding author
Akbulut, Yavuz
Venue
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Published
2024-12-18
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
1225-1242
ISSN
  • 1042-1726 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-1233
OpenAlex
W4405536999
Cited by
5
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computing in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
pre-training, cognitive load, intrinsic cognitive load, extraneous cognitive load, germane cognitive load, academic performance, computer-assisted instruction, instructional design, topic interest, achievement motivation, undergraduate students, video instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review