Cited by 24Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHealth and Well-being StudiesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Daily Stress and Social Support among Women with CAD: Results from a 1-year Randomized Controlled Stress Management Intervention Study

Blom, May, Georgiades, Anastasia, Janszky, Imre, Alinaghizadeh, Hassan, Lindvall, Birgitta, Ahnve, Staffan·2009·International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background Psychosocial stress may play a causative role in development and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose We investigated the effects of a 1-year stress management program on daily stress behavior and social support among female CAD patients. Method Women, 247 ( Results Daily stress scores for the intervention and control groups were at baseline 39.5 +/- 8.1 vs. 37.2 +/- 9.1 (p = 0.06), 10 weeks 37.2 +/- 8.0 vs. 35.5 +/- 9.4 (p = 0.20), 1-year 36.1 +/- 7.2 vs. 35.9 +/- 8.5 (p = 0.85), and at 1-2 year follow-up 34.0 +/- 7.8 vs. 35.3 +/- 8.7 (p = 0.32), respectively. Intention to treat analyses showed interaction between treatment and time [F(3,213) = 2.72; p = 0.01] reflecting that the decrease was more pronounced in the intervention group. There was no evidence for a difference in change concerning social support. Conclusion CAD women in the intervention group had a more pronounced reduction of self-rated daily stress behavior over time compared to controls. However, as the intervention group had higher baseline values, due to regression toward the mean, we have no evidence that the difference in decrease of daily stress was due to the intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12529-009-9031-y

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blom, M., Georgiades, A., Janszky, I., Alinaghizadeh, H., Lindvall, B., & Ahnve, S.
Affiliations
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Ahnve, Staffan
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2009-03-11
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
227-235
ISSN
  • 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7558
OpenAlex
W1981773134
Cited by
24
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
coronary artery disease, women, daily stress, social support, stress management interventions, group therapy, psychosocial stress, cardiac rehabilitation, regression to the mean
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Assertiveness, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Problem Solving, Relaxation Therapy, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review