The German PASS-20 in Patients with Low Back Pain: New Aspects of Convergent, Divergent, and Criterion-Related Validity
Abstract
Background The PASS-20 (McCracken and Dhingra, Pain Res Manag 7:45-50, 2002) is a shortened version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), a self-report measure of pain anxiety. The PASS-20 demonstrates good psychometric characteristics but has not yet been validated in a German population.Purpose The aims of the present study were to (1) examine the factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the German PASS-20; (2) investigate its construct validity with respect to depression, fear-avoidance, and endurance; and (3) determine its criterion-related validity with a special emphasis on pain, disability, and quality of life.Method A principal component analysis was performed on a sample (N = 195) of patients with acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain. Reliability was examined with Cronbach's α. Validity was assessed by correlating the PASS-20 to measures of depression, anxiety, disability, quality of life, and avoidance-endurance-related behavioral pain responses.Results The original four-factor structure proposed for the PASS-20 was replicated using the original subscale labels. The reliability of the total score and the subscales was satisfactory to excellent, and both convergent and divergent validity were moderate to high in the expected directions, showing positive correlations with anxiety, fear, depression, and fear-avoidance and negative correlations with endurance and quality of life. The PASS-20 showed unique predictive ability and advantages over the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia.Conclusions The results for the German PASS-20 support the original factor structure and provide evidence of satisfactory psychometric characteristics and usefulness in patients with low back pain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PASS-20 has good reliability (α = 0.90) and validity.
“Good reliability (α = 0.90) and validity have been demonstrated [30].”
From EFFects of Exposure and Cognitive behavioral Therapy for chronic BACK pain (“EFFECT-BACK”): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Kreddig, N., Rusu, A. C., Burkhardt, K., & Hasenbring, M. I.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hasenbring, Monika I.
- Venue
- International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Published
- 2014-08-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-205
- ISSN
- 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7558
- OpenAlex
- W2016527937
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- pain-related anxiety, low back pain, German translation, factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity, criterion validity, depression, fear avoidance, endurance, disability, quality of life, kinesiophobia, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Fear, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Low Back Pain, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review