Cited by 8Mental Health Treatment and AccessPublic Health and Social InequalitiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Sociodemographic predictors of attitudes to support seeking from a medical doctor or other health provider among rural Australians

Dollman, James, Gunn, Kate M., Hull, Melissa Joan·2021·International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background Rural Australians experience higher prevalence of several chronic diseases than metropolitan Australians and are less likely to access supportive health services. This study explored associations of sociodemographic factors and barriers to support seeking for health in a sample of rural South Australians.Methods Participants (n = 610) from three rural regions participated in a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI), based on the Barriers to Help Seeking Scale. Each participant reported on barriers in one of three health contexts: 'general' physical health, skin cancer, and mental health. Sociodemographic factors included gender, age, highest education, region of residence, and presence of chronic conditions. Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) determined independent associations of sociodemographic factors and barrier categories (high, medium and low importance).Results Privacy was a high-importance barrier in the mental health context, particularly among participants of age < 63 years. The tendency to minimise and normalise health issues was also a high-importance barrier in the mental health context. In the physical health context, those with a chronic condition were more likely to perceive normalisation as a barrier than those without a chronic condition. Need for control and self-reliance was a high-importance barrier in the mental health context and a low-importance barrier in the skin cancer context, particularly among participants < 63 years. Structural factors and distrust of providers were high-importance barriers among those who did not complete secondary education, regardless of context.Conclusion This study highlights the importance of a nuanced approach to promoting help-seeking in rural Australians, with message content and delivery tailored to specific health conditions and demographic circumstances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12529-021-09956-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 8

Authors
Dollman, J., Gunn, K. M., & Hull, M. J.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Hull, Melissa Joan
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2021-04-08
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
616-626
ISSN
  • 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7558
OpenAlex
W3142231037
Cited by
8
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
help-seeking barriers, help-seeking attitudes, rural health, sociodemographic factors, mental health help-seeking, chronic disease, privacy concerns, self-reliance, health promotion messaging, South Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review