The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Galileo for railway operations: question about the positioning performances analogy with the RAMS requirements allocated to safety applications
Open accessAbstract
GNSS is penetrating, surely but certainly, the railway market. Introduction is performed through non safety oriented applications such as fleet management or passenger information. However, a huge panel of safety applications could take advantage of this technology. Galileo will soon complement the navigation satellite offer, monopolized today by GPS. Some issues have to be studied before safety uses: performance requirements have to be expressed; cost benefit analysis has to prove advantages compared to installed equipment... But one of the main issues concerns safety proofs that have to be in accordance with European railway standards. Today, Galileo is not yet deployed but specifications are available. However, such specifications have been mainly driven by aeronautics. This paper deals with the question of the RAMS evaluation of the satellite-based location function delivered to a railway safety application, as recommended by railway standards and presents a methodology to transpose GNSS specifications into RAMS. It explains each definition of performance and demonstrates the relations between the Galileo SoL performances and the railway RAMS attributes. GNSS are a powerful tool to enhance railway efficiency when its adequacy with railway specifications will be proved. This paper is a contribution to this effort.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a recognized need for providing train locations in real time compliant with railway safety requirements.
“Furthermore, there is a recognized need for providing train locations in real time, which should be compliant with the railway safety requirements [131] (e.g., with the EN 50126 standard).”
From Towards the Internet of Smart Trains: A Review on Industrial IoT-Connected Railways (2017) · cites this paper as [131]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Barbu G (2008) GNSS / GALILEO certification for rail safety applications Railway requirements and the strategic position of UIC. Proceedings of WCRR 2008, Seoul, Korea
- Beugin J, Marais J (2008) Application des principes de la sûreté de fonctionnement à l’évaluation du service de localisation par satellites dans le domaine ferroviaire. Recherche Transports Sécurité n°99, Lavoisier, pp 89-103 · DOI
- Filip A (2007) Safety Aspects of GNSS Based Train Position Determination for Railway Signalling. UIC GALILEO for Rail Symposium, Paris, France
- Filip A, Beugin J, Marais J, Mocek H (2008) Interpretation of the Galileo Safety-Of-Life Service by Means of Railway RAMS Terminology. International scientific journal Transactions on Transport Sciences vol. 1-num. 2, Czech Ministry of Transport, pp 61-68 · DOI
- Marais J, Berbineau M, Frimat O, Franckart J-P (2003) A New Satellite-Based Fail-Safe Train Control and Command for Low Density Railway Lines. Proceedings of the TILT conference, Lille, France
- Nikiforov I, Choquette F (2003) Integrity Equations for Safe Train Positioning Using GNSS. ENC-GNSS 2003 - European Navigation Conference, Graz, Austria
- Poliak J, Marais J, Hänsel F, Becker U, Schnieder E (2008) Methods and Tools for the Certification of GALILEO for Railway Applications. Proceedings of WCRR 2008, Seoul, Korea
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards the Internet of Smart Trains: A Review on Industrial IoT-Connected Railways
Fraga-Lamas, P., Fernández-Caramés, T., & Castedo, L. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17061457 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Beugin, J., Filip, A., Marais, J., & Berbineau, M.
- Affiliations
- Université de Lille (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Marais, Juliette
- Venue
- European Transport Research Review
- Published
- 2010-05-14
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-102
- ISSN
- 1866-8887 (ISSN-L)
- 1867-0717
- OpenAlex
- W2004429533
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Transport Research Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Transportation Systems and Safety
- Keywords
- Galileo satellite navigation, rams, GNSS, positioning performance, railway standards, safety proofs, fleet management, passenger information, GPS
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
