Cited by 355Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesSleep and related disorders

“Every Shut Eye, Ain’t Sleep”: The Role of Racism-Related Vigilance in Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Sleep Difficulty

Open access
Hicken, Margaret T., Lee, Hedwig, Ailshire, Jennifer, Burgard, Sarah A., Williams, David R.·2013·Race and Social Problems

Abstract

Although racial/ethnic disparities in health have been well-characterized in biomedical, public health, and social science research, the determinants of these disparities are still not well-understood. Chronic psychosocial stress related specifically to the American experience of institutional and interpersonal racial discrimination may be an important determinant of these disparities, as a growing literature in separate scientific disciplines documents the adverse health effects of stress and the greater levels of stress experienced by non-White compared to White Americans. However, the empirical literature on the importance of stress for health and health disparities specifically due to racial discrimination, using population-representative data, is still small and mixed. In this paper, we explore the association between a novel measure of racially-salient chronic stress - "racism-related vigilance" - and sleep difficulty. We found that, compared to the White adults in our sample, Black (but not Hispanic) adults reported greater levels of vigilance. This vigilance was positively associated with sleep difficulty to similar degrees for all racial/ethnic groups in our sample (White, Black, Hispanic). Black adults reported greater levels of sleep difficulty compared to White adults. This disparity was slightly attenuated after adjustment for education and income. However, this disparity was completely attenuated after adjustment for racism-related vigilance. We found similar patterns of results for Hispanic compared to White adults, however, the disparities in sleep difficulty were smaller and not statistically significant. Because of the importance of sleep quality to health, our results suggest that the anticipation of and perseveration about racial discrimination is an important determinant of racial disparities in health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12552-013-9095-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such neurobiological changes may be precursors to racism-related vigilance and rumination, which are emerging as health risk factors.

    “Such neurobiological changes may also be precursors to racism-related vigilance and rumination which are emerging as health risk factors in their own right [406–411].”

    From Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015) · cites this paper as [407]

    The Background section describes rumination and racism-related vigilance as potential health risks, and the Introduction links vigilance with sleep difficulty. But the paper does not say neurobiological changes precede vigilance or rumination; it describes vigilance and rumination as potentially producing physiological activation. The Discussion calls for further research on biological mechanisms and temporal ordering (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 118 · Cited by 355

Authors
Hicken, M. T., Lee, H., Ailshire, J., Burgard, S. A., & Williams, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Hicken, Margaret T.
Venue
Race and Social Problems
Published
2013-04-30
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
100-112
ISSN
  • 1867-1748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-1756
OpenAlex
W1965122426
Cited by
355
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
49.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Race and Social Problems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R00AG039528)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD050467, R24HD041028)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
racial and ethnic disparities, sleep disorders, racial discrimination, chronic psychosocial stress, Black people, Hispanic adults, sleep quality, health disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review