Explanatory correlates of consciousness: theoretical and computational challenges.
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Temporal stability implied by hierarchical depth should be distinguished from temporal thickness in the sense implied by active inference as planning.
“The temporal stability implied by hierarchical depth (cf. Seth, 2009; Dehaene et al., 2017) should therefore be distinguished from temporal thickness in the sense implied by active inference as planning.”
From 'Seeing the Dark': Grounding Phenomenal Transparency and Opacity in Precision Estimation for Active Inference (2018) · cites this paper as Seth, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 124 · Cited by 146
- Authors
- Seth, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Seth, Anil
- ORCID
- Seth, Anil
- Venue
- Cognitive Computation
- Published
- 2009-01-25
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-63
- ISSN
- 1866-9956 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-9964
- OpenAlex
- W2017522310
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognitive Computation (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G007543/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- consciousness, integration and segregation, first-person perspective, affective consciousness, emotions, mood, intentionality, agency, voluntary action, artificial consciousness, embodiment, function of consciousness, computational models of consciousness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
