Towards food security by 2050
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Food security policies are market-oriented and ecological outcomes or SB farmer livelihoods are not of prime consideration.
“Furthermore, food security policies are market-oriented and ecological outcomes or SB farmer livelihoods are not of prime consideration [7,8].”
From Agroecological Transition: A Territorial Examination of the Simultaneity of Limited Farmer Livelihoods and Food Insecurity (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 171
- Authors
- Grafton, R. Q., Daugbjerg, C., & Qureshi, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Grafton, R. Quentin
- Venue
- Food Security
- Published
- 2015-03-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-183
- ISSN
- 1876-4517 (ISSN-L)
- 1876-4525
- OpenAlex
- W1986527049
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 32.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Food Security (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- future food systems, 2050 projections, food production, dietary intake
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
