Cited by 15Microbial Applications in Construction MaterialsCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Precipitation of high Mg-calcite and protodolomite using dead biomass of aerobic halophilic bacteria

Open access
Fan, Qigao, Liu, Deng, Papineau, Dominic, Qiu, Xuan, Wang, Hongmei, She, Zhenbing, Zhao, Linduo·2023·Journal of Earth Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12583-020-1108-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After 10-day incubation, an XRD peak at 30.76° 2θ (d-spacing 2.904 Å) matched the (104) reflection of (disordered-)dolomite, and Raman bands were consistent with disordered dolomite.

    “Notably, the characteristic peak at 30.76° 2θ (corresponding to a d-spacing of 2.904 Å) closely matched the (104) reflection of (disordered-)dolomite (Gregg et al., 2015).”

    From A non-classical crystallization mechanism of microbially-induced disordered dolomite (2024) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2023

    Section 2.3 identifies a (104) XRD reflection in the precipitates and classifies the disordered carbonate as protodolomite; Section 2.4 reports Raman bands. But Section 1.5 says the precipitates were collected after 14 days, not 10, and the copy does not report an XRD peak at 30.76° 2θ or a 2.904 Å spacing. Section 2.6 instead gives an approximately 2.910 Å (104) spacing measured by TEM. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 15

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [48]48. Xu, J., Yan, C., Zhang, F., et al., 2013. Testing the cation-hydration effect on the crystallization of Ca-Mg-CO3 systems. Proceedings of the National Academy

Authors
Fan, Q., Liu, D., Papineau, D., Qiu, X., Wang, H., She, Z., & Zhao, L.
Affiliations
  • China University of Geosciences (CN)
  • London Centre for Nanotechnology (GB)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Deng
Venue
Journal of Earth Science
Published
2023-04
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
456-466
ISSN
  • 1002-0705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1674-487X
  • 1867-111X
OpenAlex
W3144551819
Cited by
15
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Earth Science (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772362)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
protodolomite, high-Mg calcite, Exiguobacterium, carbonate precipitation, dolomitization, microbial mats, evaporitic environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review