Cited by 72Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical and construction materials studiesMaterials Engineering and Processing

Improvement in Engineering Properties of Expansive Soils using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag

Mujtaba, Hassan, Aziz, Tahir, Farooq, Khalid, Sivakugan, Nagaratnam, Das, Braja M.·2018·Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

Improvement in engineering properties of expansive soils by mixing ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) is the main focus of this research. For this purpose two expansive soil samples were collected from DG Khan and Sialkot areas (Pakistan). Classification tests revealed that DG Khan sample belonged to fat clay (CH) while Sialkot soil was lean clay (CL) as classified by Unified Soil Classification System. GGBFS has been added in varying proportions between 0 and 55% in these soil samples to study its role in stabilizing these expansive soils. Based on the laboratory test performed on composite soil samples, it was observed that maximum dry unit weight increased up to 10 % by adding 50% GGBFS in both samples. California bearing ratio (CBR) value showed an increase from 3.2 % to 11.5% for DG Khan soil while CBR values varied from 2.4% to 10.7% for Sialkot soil by mixing 50% GGBFS. Addition of 30 % GGBFS to DG Khan soil reduced swell potential from 8 % to 2 % while in Sialkot soil, 20 % addition of GGBFS reduced swell potential from 5 % to 2 %. Unconfined compressive strength of remoulded sample cured for 28 days increased by about 35% with the addition of 30%GGBFS. The results indicated that mixing of GGBFS in the expansive soil samples have a marked increase in their engineering properties. Also, it is an affective and environmental friendly means to dispose waste of steel industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12594-018-1019-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mujtaba, H., Aziz, T., Farooq, K., Sivakugan, N., & Das, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK)
  • James Cook University (AU)
  • California State University System (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mujtaba, Hassan
  • Aziz, Tahir
  • Farooq, Khalid
  • Sivakugan, Nagaratnam
  • Das, Braja M.
Venue
Journal of the Geological Society of India
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
357-362
ISSN
  • 0016-7622 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-6889
OpenAlex
W2890102571
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Geological Society of India (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
expansive soil, ground granulated blast furnace slag, soil stabilization, swell potential, California bearing ratio, unconfined compressive strength, dry unit weight, lean clay, composite soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review